Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Iraq Posting Massive Surplus Thanks To U.S. Taxpayers!" (Dan Froomkin)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 02:53 PM
Original message
"Iraq Posting Massive Surplus Thanks To U.S. Taxpayers!" (Dan Froomkin)

Iraq Posting Massive Surplus Thanks To U.S. Taxpayers

First Posted: 09-13-10 02:28 PM | Updated: 09-13-10 02:40 PM

Even as the United States has been borrowing trillions to pursue its wars in the Middle East, the government of Iraq has posted a tidy surplus, according to a new Government Accountability Office report.

The report makes a direct link between U.S. government spending -- including $642 billion on U.S. military operations there and $24 billion for training and equipping the Iraqi security forces -- and Iraq's cumulative surplus of $52.1 billion through the end of 2009.

For comparison purposes, Iraq's annual gross domestic product is $65.8 billion. Meanwhile, the U.S. national debt has soared from $6.4 trillion to $13.4 trillion since former president George W. Bush invaded Iraq and decided to borrow the money for wars and slash taxes.

The GAO report concludes with an understated recommendation that "Congress may wish to consider Iraq's available financial resources" when reviewing future funding requests to support the Iraqi security forces.

The report notes that the Obama administration is currently requesting $2 billion in additional U.S. funding in its fiscal year 2011 budget request to support the training and equipping of Iraq's military and police.

Discrepancies in Iraqi accounting led the GAO to report wide ranges in some areas. For instance, the report says that through the end of 2009 Iraq had between $15.3 billion and $32.2 billion in financial deposits held at the Central Bank of Iraq, the Development Fund for Iraq in New York, and state-owned banks in Iraq. That's quite a range.

Measuring the exact size of the Iraqi surplus is made even more difficult due to the "misappropriation of government funds and inaccurate reporting of expenditures," the scale of which is unknown but potentially staggering.

The report states that according to Iraqi government data, the country's security ministries increased their spending from 2005 through 2009 and set aside about $5.5 billion to buy U.S. weapons. "However, over this 5-year period, these ministries did not use between $2.5 billion and $5.2 billion of their budgeted funds that could have been used to address security needs," the report states.

Days after the invasion began, Bush-era deputy defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz famously told Congress that Iraq could "really finance its own reconstruction and relatively soon."

The GAO now reports: "Iraq's large oil reserves offer the government the potential to contribute to the country's current and future security and stabilization requirements. Oil revenues account for over 50 percent of the country's gross domestic product and about 90 percent of the government's revenues."

Meanwhile, Joseph E. Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning professor at Columbia University, and Harvard public policy expert Linda J. Bilmes, estimate that the true cost of the Iraq war to American taxpayers is more than $3 trillion.
Dan Froomkin
froomkin@huffingtonpost.com


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I've missed Dan...he's been hidden behind the porn at his new job at Huff Post..
But, there are linkers who remember Dan's great Work at the WaPo Blog before he got fired.

Thanks for remembering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is it still our belief that they should have paid our invasion costs?
Because that never worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Suitcases of Cash were taken by us from Saddam and his Sons...
and there were "Contractors" who took advantage of it along with NeoCon's sons and daughters sent to Iraq to set up a Stock Market (can you believe?) ...So since the NeoCons said "Iraq Invasion would Pay for Itself" then we need to hold the corrupt Iraqi Govt. we Installed to PAY US BACK!

Do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. LINK to the Early Days of the "LOOTING OF IRAQ!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-10 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Nah. We owe reparations for all those graves.
Not that we did ALL the killing, but we certainly gave them a great climate for killing each other. That being the case, anything they steal from us is fair. We stole their lives, their communities, and their electricity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just send
W to Abu Ghrab and we'll call it even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh My...that would be something...wouldn't it...?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah....putting W
in Abu Ghrab would mean something.....or do you prefer The Hague.

Stick you :eyes: up your arse, freep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC