in following Barry Goldwater's advice.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_goldwaterGoldwater famously declared in his bold acceptance speech at the 1964 Republican Convention: "I would remind you that
extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue." This paraphrase of Cicero was included at the suggestion of Harry V. Jaffa, though the speech was primarily written by Karl Hess. Due to President Johnson's popularity, however, Goldwater held back from attacking the president directly; he did not even mention Johnson by name in his convention speech.
They took that to mean
extremism in defending corporate power and the military industrial complex over the "We the People's" government while abandoning any concept of the public good.
This was a direct refutation aimed directly at former President Esienhower's farewell speech warning
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Military-Industrial_Complex_SpeechCrises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defenses; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research -- these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.
But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain
balance in and among national programs,
balance between the private and the public economy,
balance between the cost and hoped for advantages,
balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable,
balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual,
balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks
balance and progress. Lack of it eventually finds
imbalance and frustration. The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their Government have, in the main, understood these truths and have responded to them well, in the face of threat and stress.
<snip>
Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual --is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development.
Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Goldwater didn't give a damn about
balance, the Republican Party has continually drifted to the
extremism mode ever since and unfortunately to a large degree, the Democratic Party has followed suit instead of resisting the pull, in the political game of Tug of War.
Thanks for the thread, marmar.