Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rupert-über-alles must not be allowed to darken BSkyB

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-10 08:10 PM
Original message
Rupert-über-alles must not be allowed to darken BSkyB
Aren't people who prefer to give Rupert Murdoch the benefit of the doubt adorably trusting? At the precise moment his Fox News appears to have finally abandoned even the quarter-arsed pretence of impartiality, allowing Tea Party-backed candidates to fundraise on air in return for exclusive, uncritical access, there are those on these shores opining that Murdoch winning full control of BSkyB really is no biggie.

Well, quite. What's the worst that can happen?

Even as Sarah Palin appears to be fashioning a run at the presidency without appearing on any media outlet other than the one that pays her (she has her own show on Fox), there are those wittering that Murdoch basically already runs Sky, so gaining full control won't alter the UK's media landscape.

Were things across the Atlantic not looking so mind-boggling, you could almost envy that cosy, antiquated assumption that the "media landscape" is something settled, as opposed to in a state of historic flux. Sarah Palin's tweets may have to be ghostwritten – I know, even Darren Bent can fart out his own – yet, as Time magazine observed this week, a single one of them can dominate a news cycle, while one of her speeches can monopolise three news cycles.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/sep/24/rupert-murdoch-bskyb-fox-news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oceanman Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rupert
Can't someone figure out how to revoke this asshole's citzenship and send him back to Australia? Talk about seditious. This guy has done more to pollute the political discourse in this country than anyone in history - and why is it that these old, sick bastards (I recall that Rupert had cancer) from the right never die, but somehow the dems die young in plane crashes. Not that I wish anyone's death, but the obvious result of their deals with devil is living forever. I saw a recent picture of Babs Bush recently - talk about mummified. Rambling - sorry, its the beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. 'Murdoch was "ushered up the back stairs of Downing Street" ...
...which sounds like both a statement of fact and a euphemism for what Rupert has been doing to successive governments for decades.'

Right on the mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Murdoch and the Moonies
This is what happens when you turn your back on anti-trust legislation. Murdoch had to get an exemption to own most of our media. And our gubermint gave it to him.

And the wanted criminal Moonie was allowed to buy up a newspaper because he's a friend of someone.

This country needs to move back to enforcing ALL laws for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC