Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

11 Freedoms that Drunks, Slackers, Prostitutes & Pirates Pioneered and The Founding Fathers Opposed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 07:48 AM
Original message
11 Freedoms that Drunks, Slackers, Prostitutes & Pirates Pioneered and The Founding Fathers Opposed
Edited on Mon Oct-18-10 07:48 AM by marmar
via AlterNet:




Huffington Post and Free Press/Simon & Schuster / By Thaddeus Russell

11 Freedoms that Drunks, Slackers, Prostitutes and Pirates Pioneered and The Founding Fathers Opposed
What the Founding Fathers called corruption, depravity, venality and vice, many of us would call freedom.

October 16, 2010 |


During the War of Independence a culture of pleasure and freedom blossomed in American cities. Non-marital sex, including adultery and relations between whites and blacks, was ubiquitous and rarely punished. Because divorce was unregulated, it was easily and frequently obtained, often by women. Brothels were legal and abundant and prostitutes were rarely prosecuted. Black slaves, Irish indentured servants, Native Americans, and free whites of all classes commingled extensively in saloons and in the streets. Pirates who settled in the port cities brought with them a way of life that embraced both general revelry and homosexuality. On nearly every block in every 18th-century American city, there was a public place where one could drink, sing, dance, have sex, argue politics, gamble, play games, or generally carouse with men, women, children, whites, blacks, Indians, the rich, the poor, and the middling. Rarely have Americans had more fun. And never have America's leaders been less pleased by it.

To the Founding Fathers the culture of personal liberty was a more serious threat to their project of creating an independent republic than the British Army.

"Indeed, there is one enemy, who is more formidable than famine, pestilence and the sword," John Adams wrote. "I mean the corruption which is prevalent in so many American hearts, a depravity that is more inconsistent with our republican governments than light is with darkness."


The Founding Fathers hoped that self-rule would cure Americans of their love of frivolities. A government of the people, John Adams argued, would make the people disciplined, stern, hard-working, and joyless -- the qualities he most admired. It would "produce Strength, Hardiness Activity, Courage, Fortitude and Enterprise; the manly noble and Sublime Qualities in human Nature, in Abundance." Adams understood that democracy forced the people to shed their pleasures and surrender their personal freedom, because they alone would shoulder the responsibility of managing society.

"Under a well regulated Commonwealth, the People must be wise, virtuous and cannot be otherwise. Under a Monarchy they may be as vicious and foolish as they please, nay, they cannot but be vicious and foolish. ... Virtue and Simplicity of Manners are indispensably necessary in a Republic among all orders and Degrees of Men. But there is so much Rascallity, so much Venality and Corruption, so much Avarice and Ambition such a Rage for Profit and Commerce among all Ranks and Degrees of Men even in America, that I sometimes doubt whether there is public Virtue enough to Support a Republic."
.............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/media/148518/11_freedoms_that_drunks%2C_slackers%2C_prostitutes_and_pirates_pioneered_and_the_founding_fathers_opposed_/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Puritans Still Trying to Win
but the Americans keep resisting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. so we were all San Franciscans?
while i admire the founders on the one hand -- like anybody else -- they wanted to get up in the peoples business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Probably......
...... I think I saw a few of them hanging out at O'Farrell and Jones St. the last time I was there. :)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. you probably saw me!!!
it's really interesting that real proponents of the Enlightenment had this idealistic puritan streak in them.

i've always seen them as brilliant and deeply conflicted people. -- which for me -- makes them more interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Same deal with the "progressive" movement of the late 19th century
I won't knock most of the progressive movement's ideals, such as child labor laws, but there were puritanical elements as well--Prohibition, for example, was a child of the progressive movement. With the Temperance movement came a push to stamp out all types of "vice"--smoking, gambling, "sexual misbehavior" and drugs. The earliest drug laws came at the peak of the Progressive Era, just before the outbreak of World War I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. that's true isn't it? -- the late 19th century did indulge
in that kind of over reaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC