Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF?: A Letter to Appalled, Puzzled European Friends

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
CrisisPapers Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:44 AM
Original message
WTF?: A Letter to Appalled, Puzzled European Friends
l Bernard Weiner, The Crisis Papers l

Dear Wolfgang and Jacqueline:

Your recent email, wondering "what the f--- is going on" these days, questioning whether we Americans have taken "more than your usual amount of stupid pills," is well deserving of a considered response.

How is it possible, you ask, that the very rightwing party whose policies helped create the current mess may very well take control of the House of Representatives and conceivably the Senate as well, in the upcoming November elections? "Is the U.S.A. experiencing some kind of death wish? Are we in Europe witnessing the paroxysms of a failing democracy, and a failing empire? Will the flat-Earth Know Nothings really take over in America?" Good questions all.

It's not easy to explain to foreigners what's happening here and what to do about it. I do know that in too many societies, for a relatively brief period of time, a contagious irrationality seems to spread dangerous nonsense in the polity; moral moorings and common sense fly out the window. It's happened in your countries: the French right now ethnically-cleansing themselves of the Roma/Gypsy peoples, for example, or the Holocaust in Germany in the 1930-40s. But I'll have a go at some explanations, and you and your families and friends in those countries can tell me whether my analyses make any sense.

THE IDEOLOGICAL DIVIDE

To understand our current and dangerous political circus requires a quick romp through the historical context:

The first thing to understand is that what's happening today in American politics is not new. One could go back to the major philosophical splits amongst the Founding Fathers who, because of ideological fervor, were at each others' throats over how to distribute power. Or we could go back to the "robber barons" era of the late 19th century, when capitalist greed and industrial might, both basically unregulated at the time, ran roughshod over the economy and country. That unrestricted "free-market" philosophy helped lead eventually to the Great Depression and the resulting major social correctives of FDR and the Democrats in the 1930s-1940s.

But for our purposes here, let's pick up the thread in 1964 when Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater was the Republican candidate for president.

EXTREMISM AS A CHERISHED VALUE

For the first time in the modern era, extremism and incitements to violence were given political cover as they were introduced by a presidential candidate into American's civic bloodstream. "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice," said Goldwater, to cheering GOP convention delegates.

The corporate/fundamentalist forces behind the Goldwater candidacy knew their candidate would not win, could not win, in a country still deeply appreciative of popular liberal policies coming out of post-World War II reconstruction in the 1950s.

The aim of these wealthy forces was to purge the GOP of its moderate voices and create an ideologically pure, HardRight party that through education, political activism and constant agitprop would eventually triumph over "decadent liberalism."

Clearly, they were thinking long term, and it paid off: Ronald Reagan's victory came 16 years later, in 1980. How did they do it?

BUYING THEIR WAY TO VICTORY

In the years after the Goldwater debacle, billionaire conservative tycoons bought up mass-media outlets -- book-publishing firms, newspapers, cable news networks, etc. They funded their own think tanks, with their in-house academic types churning out intellectual-sounding arguments. They supported with millions of dollars rightwing student groups on college campuses. They sponsored how-to-win-election workshops for potential candidates. They donated huge amounts to centrist news networks, such as PBS (look at who supports "The News Hour" these days: Chevron, Pacific Life Insurance, Archer Daniels Midlands, et al.), to help dilute the tenor of objective journalism.

Liberals, meanwhile, were, as usual, dazed and confused, in denial about what was happening to them and supremely over-confident that their fortress of power was unassailable. A native fascism could never happen in America, they believed, since reason would win out over demagoguery and extremist, authoritarian, Big-Lie politics. Right.

The GOP could always count on one third of the electorate -- by and large, the fundamentalist, anti-science, anti-change, more authoritarian base -- and were able to lure a goodly number of independents and libertarians to their cause on certain issues, aided by an increasingly badly-educated citizenry easily influenced by the mass-media's emphasis on fluff and nonsense and biased reporting (read: Fox News).

WHACK AN "ENEMY"

Every movement needs a hated enemy. Having one helps stir the emotions, which means lots of small donations from millions of scared citizens, which means a huge mailing/recruitment list to build from. In the post-World War II period, up until the Communist Party imploded in the Soviet Union in the late-'80s, the Republicans' favorite bete noire was "godless communism," both abroad and internally. "Socialism" was included under the hated rubric "communism," just to be sure, and then "liberalism" was conflated with "socialism," to destroy that brand.

In the 1990s, the conservatives' enemies of choice included homosexuals and blacks and browns; later those "enemies" morphed into "terrorists," "immigrants" and, for too many, "Muslims." Quick version: the Other. You can always count on "God, Guns & Gays" to help you win votes.

What is being played so skillfully by the power-composers of the Right (with Karl Rove as conductor extraordinaire) is the instrument of change as something to fear. The calm, comfortable world that most middle-class whites grew up in is quickly cracking apart. More and more ethnic and social minorities are moving out of their real and perceived "ghetto" and proudly moving into the social, political and cultural mainstream, jockeying for power and influence just like everybody else. Internationally, similar changes are happening, as formerly subservient countries and leaders chafe under U.S. hegemony and begin to push back. American exceptionalism is taking a beating.

OUR ERA'S GREAT DEPRESSION

All this is genuinely unsettling, disturbing, scary to many, some of whom feel -- thanks to incendiary language and incitement to action by rightwing bloviators -- encouraged to initiate violence against leader-identified "enemies." Don't those people and nations know their "place"?

And then a "perfect storm" of social/political/economic collapse occurred in the last years of the CheneyBush Administration:

* Virtually unregulated, rapacious capitalism led to a meltdown of the financial system, showing up most visibly in desperate failures of the huge investment houses, which had been selling unsecured debt instruments in a massive Ponzi-like scheme. The ramifications of such giant failures affected economies in countries worldwide, and led to austerity programs negatively impacting mostly the working and middle-classes. (Unlike docile Americans, millions of Spaniards and French and Belgians and Greeks have erupted into open opposition in the streets.)

* The mortgages at the heart of these unsecured debt instruments ("derivatives," "credit default swaps") were peddled by unscrupulous lenders, and when the economy and real-estate values tanked, the buyers of homes were left holding the bag. Of course, virtually none of those in the banks and corporate offices who sold those instruments were ever punished. In our current plutocratic system, rarely do leaders in positions of power ever have to pay a real penalty for their bad, or even illegal, acts. Either they are given a free pass or they find a "bad-apple" scapegoat.

* With the economy in the toilet, and the Republicans resisting any stimulus or other effective measures to help the working and middle-class climb out, fewer and fewer Americans had any cash to buy big-ticket items and many, with no jobs and the safety-net shredded and their pensions and retirement savings cut in half, had to struggle just to keep afloat. That meant factories were shuttered, in addition to those that had been closed because of "outsourcing" of jobs to China, Mexico, India, et al. during the Clinton and Bush presidencies. Millions were laid off and, due to the resulting loss of tax revenues, cities and states were out of monies to finance everything from police and firefighters to helpful civil servants.

As I write this, an estimated 10-18% of the workforce (roughly 20 million citizens) are unemployed, and having extreme difficulty finding jobs. More than 35% of American children are living in poverty. And this current Great Depression is projected to last many years, maybe a decade or more, as a result of Republican machinations and Democratic timidity.

MILLIONS OF JOBLESS RECRUITS

Wolfgang, you know better than I do the possible ramifications of having millions of unemployed young men, many of them under-educated, feeling like rejected losers. As we know from what happened in Germany in the 1930s, these angry, frustrated masses of young men and their parents become perfect fodder for extremist demagogues. What's most frightening is that these likely recruits, energized by their rage and emotions, feel comfortable inside a balloon of voluntary ignorance, eager to support such political nitwits as Sarah Palin, Christine O'Donnell, Carl Paladino, Sharron Angle, Rand Paul, Ken Buck and the rest.

Simple example: When asked whether they support Obama's new health-care approach, many of these newborn rightwing activists rant about how the government shouldn't be in the business of helping people via entitlement programs. But they get very angry if there is any talk about cutting back or eliminating their agriculture subsidies or Social Security checks or Medicare coverage. When their hypocrisy is pointed out to them, it becomes clear that they feel they deserve the government help but the Others, especially minorities and the poor, do not. Racism and classism are alive and well in the American polity.

Today, many young, unemployed men (and their parents), devoid of hope, wind up recruited by militias and political groups of one sort or another, and are encouraged into action by far-right demagogues like Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Sarah Palin to channel their anger into the Tea Party movement allied with the Republican Party. Their "enemies," they are led to believe, are minorities, journalists, "the government," gays, Muslims, liberals, immigrants, "moderate" politicians, the supposed SocialistMuslimNaziStalinist in the White House, et al. In other words, every angry citizen can pick a convenient enemy to hate and act against.

TIMID & ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL

Normally, the party in power would provide energized correctives to pull the confused, frustrated masses back toward the middle. But the Democrats, and especially President Obama, have been mostly clueless as to how to combat this movement, which is based on lies, arrogance, duplicity and threats of (and actual) violence. In any event, their halfway-effective responses were always many months too late. Only in recent days, for example, has Obama even begun to energize his base to fight back in the midterm election, now two weeks away. He's only partially successful since he and his spokesmen have belittled the Democrats' progressive base for nearly two years now, using it as a convenient punching bag as he tried to lure Republicans and Independents to his side.

Obama was at least a year late in recognizing what progressives knew mere weeks after his inauguration: that there was no way he ever would be able to gain GOP support for any of his programs. The Republicans had one goal and one goal only: destroying his presidency in order to regain their political power, and all the perk$ that go with that power. If, in their desire to overturn all the social advances of the New Deal and Great Society, our current Great Depression gets worse, if millions more lose their jobs, if the government goes bankrupt, well, that is just the "collateral damage" the country will have to bear in the name of Freedom.

MIRRORING CHENEY-BUSH POLICIES

Obama had run a campaign in 2008 based on major structural change; transparency in governance; moving away from CheneyBush policies with regard to respect for the Constitution, civil liberties, disengaging from the previous administration's bullying approach in foreign/military policy. But once in the White House, he continued many of the worst policies begun by his predecessor in amassing presidential power unchecked by Congress or the courts. For example, he has assumed the right, with no checks on his authority, to order the assassinations of Americans suspected of alliances with terrorists. And he has enlarged, rather than diminished, U.S. operations in Afghanistan, and found a way to authorize "extraordinary renditions" to other countries especially skilled in torturing prisoners.

Obama can rightfully point to a good many solid initiatives that a President McCain never would have pushed for, but, overall, Obama has come across as pretty much a conventional Washington Beltway politician, consistently siding with corporate agendas, jettisoning his campaign attitude and promises far too quickly along the way. No wonder his base is only partially in the Democrats' corner for this election. So many of the Obama stalwarts in 2008 -- students, African-Americans, progressives -- have abandoned him because they feel he abandoned them, early and often.

EMERGING FROM THE CRAZY

One can hope that a galvanized Get-Out-the-Vote campaign by the Democrats will be able to salvage some key races and keep the most egregiously lunatic candidates from moving into the Senate and House. But even if the Dems manage to extract some good news in this midterm election, it seems clear that the shift in momentum and power-relationship does not bode well for American society in the next decade.

In short, unless some electoral GOTV miracle occurs on November 2, I will anticipate getting more letters from you two as America continues to wallow in its despair, social spasms, energized political flailings. We are entering the choppy waters of dire straits. We don't know how many years will go by before Americans might experience "buyer remorse," before they decide they've had enough and return to their senses, before the epidemic of crazy runs its course.

In the interim, one can expect that revolutionary attitudes and forces will be building strength against politics-as-usual in America. While some of that is devoutly to be wished, we'll all be going on a wild roller-coaster ride. Buckle up. As Tiny Tim might have said: "God help us everyone!" -- BW


Copyright 2010 by Bernard Weiner.

First published by The Crisis Papers 10/19/10.
http://www.crisispapers.org/essays10w/european.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. European corporations like banks and drug companies are buying this election
Edited on Wed Oct-20-10 01:57 AM by McCamy Taylor
along with India, Saudi and the Chinese. Your European friends should be as happy as clams that their drug prices will be kept low because their drug companies can sell high in the US via the GOP scam Medicare D. Europeans know that this happens. The Guardian UK demanded that US health care reform not include any attempt to cut our drug costs...because we subsidize their care in the UK.

I dont think anyone in any country of the world has any business getting involved in a US election. Because when they do, they look out for their best interests not ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w0nderer Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. a potential modification
hope you don't mind me modifying that to be less 'special'/exceptional?

"I dont think anyone in any country of the world has any business getting involved in <strike>a US</strike>another nations election. Because when they do, they look out for their best interests not ours.

unless you meant the first: "It's ok when WE do it, it's just not ok when others do it to us"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
afredus Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. US election law encourages this.
What do you think Multinationals would do? Not take advantage of election finance laws in the US? Simple solution: Ban corporate donations. Done in Quebec, Canada since 1980.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Living,
Edited on Wed Oct-20-10 02:50 AM by chervilant
as we do, in exponential times, we frequently witness the use of incorrect verb tenses. For example, we 'are entering the choppy waters of dire straits' should read we 'are currently treading the choppy waters of dire straits.'

And, the teabaggers, almost to a one, wear their 'revolutionary attitudes' on their sleeves--proudly. They are virtually unshakeable in their worldview, spewing venomous hatred towards Obama, liberals, gays, women, Jews, and a myriad of other loosely-defined segments of our society. To many of us it is clear that their patriotism is their last refuge. To them, not so much...

As for me, I WANT to look away, but I can't. It's like watching that astonishing show, Hoarders. I used to think, "There but for the Grace of God go I." Now, I think, "OMG!! WTF!?!?"

BTW, 'maybe a decade or more' is a gross underestimate of the length of time it will take our nation (and the rest of the planet) to recover from this, the grinding to a complete standstill of the massive train wreck that remains the most disgusting legacy from St. Ronnie's reign of economic terror. 'Free market,' my rear appendage!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. What Mr. Weiner failed to mention
was that the Democrats could (and should) have dramatically changed this dynamic by enacting one simple piece of legislation.
President Obama had, and still has the authority, through his FCC appointment, to reinstate The Fairness Doctrine.
This would require (as in pre-Reagan days) that our ""News" programs air all differing viewpoints and also be honest not partisan.
While this would expose Obama "warts" as well. It would also have the effect of producing a truly informed populace. Not a propagandized citizenry but an educated one.
It would also bust the monopolies that currently have seized our major source of information.
President Obama, I guess, decided that it was better to leave the propaganda machine in place rather than having his "warts" exposed along with those of the Rethugs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I agree with you, dotymed....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. This did not necessarily work well
I used to live near Buffalo NY. One of the clearly right-wing TV stations' solution to the Fairness Doctrine was to put on some wacko (probably a paid actor) from the loonie fringe left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. Too Many Americans Have NO "Senses" to Come To
Too many citizens of all ages, sexes and races have no capacity to deal with reality.

What else explains the rampant drug, alcohol, tobacco, food, sex addictions?

What else explains the self-defeating strategies, political, economic, and interpersonal?

What else explains the "leaders" who would lead the nation like Foxy Loxy led Chicken Little and friends into self-destruction?

Everyone is in search of a feel-good, no-brainer, remote-control, let-George-do-it solution to whatever is bothering them. The idea that one must think, study, invest time and money, strategize, and unite with neighbors is totally UnAmerican and uncool. That's so 40's, man!

The US has been sitting on its laurels since the winning of WWII. It's been sitting on and/or killing its nascent, up=and=coming leadership since the Civil Rights, Kennedy and others assassinations, and the shootings at Kent State over the Peace Movement.

Today's smart young leaders, if they've a prayer, are moving to other lands.

I see no reason, not even a Great Depression, for this mindset, this thrall, to break any time soon. The last best chance for change, Barack Obama, was a total flop. A lot of people put their time, money, and hope on this one man. Their investment has not been paying off.

A nation's character is changed by change. We haven't gotten any change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
This summarizes our situation quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Excellent Assessment
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. My one complaint is "unemployed young men (and their parents)"
Every survey shows that the Tea Partiers are overwhelmingly older white males with above-average incomes and conservative social attitudes.

The Tea Party mantra of "taxed enough already" is not a slogan to appeal to the unemployed. It's one for those who feel they've got theirs and are terrified of having to share with the less fortunate.

Unemployed youths are not flocking to any kind of neo-fascist movements. It could yet happen if things get bad enough, but right now the young are the most liberal group in the country, especially on social issues.

So if Weiner is trying to apply a 1930s-Germany template to our current situation, he's being misled at least to a degree.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. The gloss over of some facts is chilling here
"French right now ethnically-cleansing themselves of the Roma/Gypsy peoples." Yes they are. What has Jaqueline to say about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. no killing going on
just enforcement of immigration policy which is already set to expire... expelling people to another eu country.... so fucking stupid but that is sarkozy and you see that he has about 20 percent approval now and most french people thought that was stupid to expell members of the european union... we have right wing racist assholes who in general are older but there are some racist youth but some dick in the govt proposed an amendment which was adopted which will soon do away with double nationality here, hence the rioting...... the cited north african countries, israel, and the usa as source countries of people who have 2 nationalities which pose problems for france.... it is laughable and they are appealing to the roughly 15 or 20% on our extreme right....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Makes you wonder how
,with all this stacked against the Dems, we ever win an election. Maybe it just goes to prove that there still are people with common sense out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raven42 Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-20-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. good read
and when all those tea-party voters discover that their economic situation is still not improving, even with the republicans in control of congress, they'll just get even angrier. But not at the republicans, of course. Just at all those liberals, minorities, immigrants, etc. The immediate future does not look encouraging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Pretty tasteless...
that implicit comparison of the Sarkozy government's nasty expulsion of some non-citizen Roma, to the Holocaust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-21-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC