Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supremely Bad Judgment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-10 06:54 PM
Original message
Supremely Bad Judgment
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/24/opinion/24dowd.html

In the wacky coda to one of the most searing chapters in American history, everyone remained true to form.

(snip)

As The Times’s Jackie Calmes wrote, Mrs. Thomas started her nonprofit in late 2009 with two gifts of $500,000 and $50,000, and additional sums this year that we don’t know about yet. She does not have to disclose the donors, whose money makes possible the compensation she brings into the Thomas household.

There is no way to tell if her donors have cases before the Supreme Court or whether her husband knows their identities. And she never would have to disclose them if her husband had his way.

The 5-to-4 Citizens United decision last January gave corporations, foreign contributors, unions, Big Energy, Big Oil and superrich conservatives a green light to surreptitiously funnel in as much money as they want, whenever they want to elect or unelect candidates. As if that weren’t enough to breed corruption, Thomas was the only justice — in a rare case of detaching his hip from Antonin Scalia’s — to write a separate opinion calling for an end to donor disclosures.

In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court chose the Republican president. In Citizens United, the court may return Republicans to control of Congress. So much for conservatives’ professed disdain of judicial activism. And so much for the public’s long-held trust in the impartiality of the nation’s highest court.

(end snip)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maureen Dowd does herself a disservice
to characterize Anita Hill's current response as "starchy disgust". I don't know why Dowd always has to paint everyone in a perjorative light. I saw Anita Hill's response. She simply asked the reporter to get out of the street so she could drive away. She has been true to herself for twenty years and that's not starchy disgust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-10 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am kind of getting tired of reading all of this shit
It accomplishes nothing. I keep wondering when we're going to do something. The case to impeach Slappy Thomas is now open-and-shut. The Supreme Court building should be stormed and occupied until that slimy piece of shit is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-23-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is treasonous
to give international entities so much secret money. They have betrayed the American people, all of us, and this is not a partisan issue!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC