Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Hedges: "The death of the liberal class...is catastrophic for our democracy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 08:31 AM
Original message
Chris Hedges: "The death of the liberal class...is catastrophic for our democracy"
from truthdig:



The World Liberal Opportunists Made
Posted on Oct 25, 2010

By Chris Hedges


The lunatic fringe of the Republican Party, which looks set to make sweeping gains in the midterm elections, is the direct result of a collapse of liberalism. It is the product of bankrupt liberal institutions, including the press, the church, universities, labor unions, the arts and the Democratic Party. The legitimate rage being expressed by disenfranchised workers toward the college-educated liberal elite, who abetted or did nothing to halt the corporate assault on the poor and the working class of the last 30 years, is not misplaced. The liberal class is guilty. The liberal class, which continues to speak in the prim and obsolete language of policies and issues, refused to act. It failed to defend traditional liberal values during the long night of corporate assault in exchange for its position of privilege and comfort in the corporate state. The virulent right-wing backlash we now experience is an expression of the liberal class’ flagrant betrayal of the citizenry.

The liberal class, which once made piecemeal and incremental reform possible, functioned traditionally as a safety valve. During the Great Depression, with the collapse of capitalism, it made possible the New Deal. During the turmoil of the 1960s, it provided legitimate channels within the system to express the discontent of African-Americans and the anti-war movement. But the liberal class, in our age of neo-feudalism, is now powerless. It offers nothing but empty rhetoric. It refuses to concede that power has been wrested so efficiently from the hands of citizens by corporations that the Constitution and its guarantees of personal liberty are irrelevant. It does not act to mitigate the suffering of tens of millions of Americans who now make up a growing and desperate permanent underclass. And the disparity between the rhetoric of liberal values and the rapacious system of inverted totalitarianism the liberal class serves makes liberal elites, including Barack Obama, a legitimate source of public ridicule. The liberal class, whether in universities, the press or the Democratic Party, insists on clinging to its privileges and comforts even if this forces it to serve as an apologist for the expanding cruelty and exploitation carried out by the corporate state.

Populations will endure repression from tyrants as long as these rulers continue to effectively manage and wield power. But human history has amply demonstrated that once those in positions of power become redundant and impotent, yet retain the trappings and privileges of power, they are swiftly and brutally discarded. Tocqueville observed that the French, on the eve of their revolution, hated the aristocrats about to lose their power far more than they had ever hated them before. The increased hatred directed at the aristocratic class occurred because as the aristocracy lost real power there was no decline in their fortunes. As long as the liberal class had even limited influence, whether through the press or the legislative process, liberals were tolerated and even respected. But once the liberal class lost all influence it became a class of parasites. The liberal class, like the déclassé French aristocracy, has no real function within the power elite. And the rising right-wing populists, correctly, ask why liberals should be tolerated when their rhetoric bears no relation to reality and their presence has no influence on power. ..................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_world_liberal_opportunists_made_20101025/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosaic Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Liberals are too honest
The conservatives are sneaky crooks and liars. Cheating pays off for them, as they undid things like the Fairness Doctrine, and allowed the bail outs, citizens united, the list is long unfortunately. To defeat them and throw them in the trash heap of history will take serious planning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. he's using ''liberal'' in the narrower sense that the rest of the world does, not our broad
everyone left of Ann Coulter sense.

It would be more accurate to call them technocrats of the free market as opposed to the GOP's crony capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rec for truth. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting letter from Commenter at site on Chris Hedges article:
In case some of you didn't read the comments or the whole article..I thought this was interesting.

By Alphysicist, October 25 at 10:02 am Link to this comment

Dear Chris Hedges:

Great article, and I also liked your book Empire of Illusion. At a fundamental level I disagree, however: the so called liberal class is not a group of people who just stood by as Wall street raped the country and so forth. This point of view assigns them a rather passive role. But they were ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS, not to mention beneficiaries in what happened. The Ivy League trained (Nobel-Prize winning) economists were not making mistakes when they advocated deregulation (which was championed by the Clinton administration): they were providing the ideological and pseudo-rational background for what was happening (an example of non-negligible and willful participation for prestige and generous pay in return).

The anti-segregation and the anti-war movements of the sixties were also corrupted by the liberal class into something that they were not intended to be. Political correctness was introduced to stifle criticism of the elites: for example the criticism of AIPAC or even to mention the U.S.S. Liberty was for a long time (and still is) treated on the same level as genuine racism. Justified anger of African-Americans is very often channeled into hate of the white working class neighbor (because they happen to be on average marginally better off), rather than used as a basis for genuine progressive reform. It is now more a kind of “divide et impera” politics. As mass uncontrolled immigration also threatens the jobs of the working class (especially the un-skilled working class) it would be the job of the liberal class to stand up against it. However, as usual, they use the term “racism” to stifle criticism of this form of outsourcing.

The anti-war movements of the sixties were diverted in the direction of the “sexual revolution”, an extension, in the end, of the consumer culture, which had strong profit motives (the rise of the porn industry, which you detail in your book, could not have been made possible without the sexual revolution). (Please read for example the book “Elementary Particles”, by M. Houellebecq, or see the BBC series on the life of Eddie Bernays.)

For the killing of culture, Hollywood and the mainstream media bears a large fraction of responsibility. The Jerry Springers and co. are not by any means arch-conservatives. But also, the why study “dead white males” movement at universities (which also uses the struggle against racism as a cover) is one of the factors which lead to Dickens and co. being forgotten.

The problem with the so called liberal class is that they end up corrupting the idea of solidarity. The Republican right is openly pro-business and pro-profit in most cases, so it is not as corrupt of them to act accordingly. A Wolfensohn (ex-president of the World Bank) playing the role of the champion of the poor is just like Madonna presenting herself as an actress.

Reading your book it occurred to me that liberal class is somewhat of an oxymoron: liberal thinking, which is open and critical, is by its very nature a subversive activity. The idea of a class (in the sense in which your article uses it), however, assumes some sort of connection or participation in institutions of power.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_world_liberal_o... /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
snip...

The liberal class is finished. Neither it nor its representatives will provide the leadership or resistance to halt our slide toward despotism. The liberal class prefers comfort and privilege to confrontation. It will not halt the corporate assault or thwart the ascendancy of the corporate state. It will remain intolerant within its ranks of those who do.
===

Good article. I'm going to check out Hedges book.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. yup
Edited on Mon Oct-25-10 07:29 PM by Skittles
look at DU - all kinds of so-called "progressives" cheering on complete pro-corporate garbage. Falling for shit like so-called "Healthcare Reform". Fucking SAD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. must see Hedges lecture for release of book -->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Wow! What a speech.
I've got to forward that everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Strongly recommend listening to this speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. I heard it on pacifica. In a way, he describes something more chilling than the Bush years
an impotent ''opposition'' that is as obedient to the powerful as the supposed corporate party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. The DLCers took over. They need purging. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. All too true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. This country deserves to lose the respect of the world. We haven't done right by the people in this
country. The right wing just loves their god yet can't see they are not truly following god's way. We deserve to be a 3rd rate country. We have no honor left. The rich sent our jobs to China and laughing all the way to the bank. I hope the teabaggers are very happy. They are to stupid to see how they were being used. All because they can't support a black man. Wait your going to get back your republicans and we will get f'd over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill USA Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. liberal/progressive voices have been locked out of all discussion in politics & m$m (dem&repub)
hard to compete when you are not allowed on the field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. where are all the usual DLC, corporate Democrat defenders?
This probably made them piss themselves, not because it said they abandoned the people they are supposed to represent (they couldn't give a shit less about that) but because Hedges is right: if they just execute the orders of the rich, they are superfluous, and could be dealt out of the game without being missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zenprole Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Quotable
There are a half-dozen corkers in this short essay, one that everyone on DU should take to heart.

My favorite: "The liberal class has cut itself off from the roots of creative and bold thought, from those forces and thinkers who could have prevented the liberal class from merging completely with the power elite. Liberals exude a tepid idealism utterly divorced from daily life. And this is why every television clip of Barack Obama is so palpably pathetic."

Chris Hedges, Matt Taibbi, and Joe Bageant should collaborate on a book/screenplay/revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
18. Kick and Rec!
I, for one, am getting sick and tired of seeing Chomsky and Nader every time I turn on the TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
19. liberals "think outside the box"..
they are never satisfied with the status quo, always looking for change (way of doing things better). Yeah, at least in politics, the liberal class is dead :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucy Goosey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
20. Good Hedges interview & roundtable video here...
http://www.tvo.org/cfmx/tvoorg/theagenda/index.cfm?page_id=7&bpn=779880&ts=2010-10-2220:00:00.0

It's Canadian (public) TV - I figure it hasn't been widely viewed, and I enjoyed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. I ordered his book last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. incredible: DLCers STILL aren't howling at this. Guess they haven't got talking points yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I don't know why you think this is limited to the DLC; it's the whole Democratic Party he attacks
Edited on Thu Oct-28-10 07:02 PM by muriel_volestrangler
plus labor unions, universities, the press (I note he doesn't say 'the media' - I guess he reasonably doesn't think factual TV has been liberal at any time), 'the arts' (broadbrush, but it's his term) and 'the church' (a strange phrase for an American to use - it implies that American Christianity (and may he includes other religions too in it) speaks with one 'liberal' voice, which doesn't seem to fit with the Southern Baptists, megachurches and so on that are so popular in the US).

The thing is that 'capitalism must die' calls, like this, still don't go down well in the USA. Capitalism is all the country has known. Capitalist countries still have the highest median standards of living of any countries in the world, and, since Hedges conveniently forgets to say what he proposes in its place, the whole piece is a "I'm as mad a hell" rant without a direction. People will look at it, and think "always hold on tight to nurse, for fear of finding something worse". The typical American is not about to take to the streets to destroy capitalism. A depressing number of Teabaggers are taking to the streets to demand unregulated capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scentopine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. OFA and DLC are dancing on the grave of liberals
only too happy to be realistic about the benevolence of corporations and oil drilling and war and wire tapping and union busting and privatizing schools with their sights on social security. Yep, they gave us health care that bails out the insurance companies and drug companies and they bailed out the banks while they continue to blame home owners for the mortgage disaster.

That's my Democrats. All the disaster messaging in the world can't wash the stains of blood of their ruinous hands.

Obama will tell you that you must get a college degree to "build a strong Amercia"

Meanwhile, colleges raise tuition 7% to 8% a year. So, kids take out loans from banks with even higher interest rates.

Then after you struggle between jobs and school, you graduate and 10 million jobs are sent to India and China.

You move back in and stay on your parents insurance policy till you are 26.

At least that was the plan until your dad got laid-off. Then they foreclosed on the house.

So this election as you vote democrat or republican know that both parties are working hard to get as much of your present and future wealth as possible while giving you little or nothing in return.

Keep voting for mainstream political parties, keep sending them money, keep telling yourself that we are only smart enough as a nation to deal with two similar political parties and things will only get worse and worse.

I am waiting for anyone to prove me wrong. Hasn't happened, never will.

This latest crop of democrats are the worst of the bunch a hybrid of neo-con and neo-lib - "they bring forth their love child THE CENTRIST".

Democrats are so out of touch and unable to lead. They are triangulating, twisting in the wind, constantly trying to behave like 1980s Reagan neo-cons.

They cannot and will not lead. They won't stand up to the right wing of both parties because they are the right wing of both partiues, they have no unifying message other than "we don't suck as bad as the other guys". I've lost respect for people who continue to vote for people who do not offer them representation.

We need a new political party to give "establishment" democrats and republicans the beating they deserve.

Or is America just too stupid to understand that democracy can support more than two parties?

Disgusting. Completely and utterly disgusting.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC