Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

4 Million Americans Set To Lose Unemployment Benefits Even If Congress Passes Extension (CHART)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:50 AM
Original message
4 Million Americans Set To Lose Unemployment Benefits Even If Congress Passes Extension (CHART)
Even as Congress debates whether to extend emergency unemployment checks for more than six million Americans who are approaching the 99-week limit, some four million others are facing the certain end of their benefits over the next year, unless an entirely new program is crafted.

This is the sobering conclusion of a report released by the President's Council of Economic Advisers on Thursday. The study forecast that the exhaustion of unemployment benefits for so many will curb spending power enough to significantly impede an already weak economic recovery.

The typical household now receiving emergency unemployment benefits would see their income fall by a third should they lose their checks, according to the report. Among the roughly 40 percent of households in which the person receiving a check is the sole breadwinner, income would fall by 90 percent.

The existing emergency unemployment program, which extends benefits for nearly two years, expired on Wednesday. Without an agreement to extend the program, the economy will lose about 600,000 jobs, as the spending enabled by continued unemployment checks ceases. National economic output--which expanded at an annual pace of 2.5 percent during the summer months--would fall off by 0.6 percent.

That disturbing prospect does not even account for the roughly four million people who would exceed even the extended limits in the emergency program. Were that many jobless people left to fend themselves without unemployment checks, that would pose significant risks for the broader economy, say economists. They cite the fact that consumer spending accounts for roughly 70 percent of all economic activity.

"If you're looking for economic recovery supported by consumers, it's discouraging," said Henry J. Aaron, an economist at the Brookings Institution, a research institution in Washington. "It's drag on the economy."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/03/unemployment-benefits-99ers-obama_n_791682.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. So what's your point?
Most of the cash goes to the wealthiest Americans, so this is a success.

Perhaps the unemployed can sell their children, or a kidney, or do something else entrepreneurial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Seems our discouraged worker pool keeps getting larger and larger.
and they don't even get counted in that fake 9.8% unemployment rate the media and Obama claims represents the job market.

I love the way the gubermint lumps discouraged workers, people who have been out of work so long they can no longer qualify for a job if they can find one, with those people who work part time. Makes it seems like there is always a part time job for us losers who can't find full employment. As if the part timers and the 99ers are the same people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Damn. I hadn't even finished my first bottle of champaign from yesterday's
"success". I think I'll switch to hemlock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. 90% loss of income
means that i would buy a gun... and a ski mask... or buy a kilo of grass, heroin or crack and go into business, i would not watch my wife prostitute herself to feed me and the kids. dealing first, robbing second??? naaa drugs are worse than robbing to most judges, may as well just rob, but sorry, cant leave any witness even if i have a ski mask...bang your fucking dead and its like that! look for violence to explode across the country along with theft, drug dealing and the violence between new and old dealers, as well as more prostitution and violence between the old and new hookers....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. THE OBSCENELY RICH ARE MORE IMPORTANT!!
GET WITH THE PROGRAM, JOANNE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC