Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don’t use archaic spy law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 07:49 AM
Original message
Don’t use archaic spy law
Don’t use archaic spy law
PROSECUTE WIKILEAKS FOUNDER? | Globe Editorial
December 9, 2010

WHILE WIKILEAKS founder Julian Assange damaged America’s relations with other countries by releasing some 250,000 diplomatic cables, any attempt to prosecute him under an archaic antispying law would do more harm than good.

In an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal this week, Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California called for Assange to be “vigorously prosecuted’’ under the Espionage Act of 1917. While Assange has not been accused of breaking into the government’s leaky computer networks to steal the cables, his organization was the conduit in making the documents public. Feinstein, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, argues that Assange violated the 1917 law, which forbids the possession or transmission of “information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation.’’

The law is a relic of World War I anxieties, and its very breadth helps explain why it has been used so rarely. It could all too easily be exploited to trample rights Americans take for granted — especially freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The law is vague enough that it could have been used against the journalists who exposed the Abu Ghraib scandal in Iraq, or similar instances of wrongdoing.

Assange has taken the doctrine of total transparency far enough to make traditional diplomacy nearly impossible, so it’s easy to see why federal officials would look for a way to prosecute him. But the 1917 Espionage Act isn’t it. Rather, it’s a bad law that should be repealed or modified, perhaps in a way that would target future Assanges without jeopardizing legitimate speech or reporting.



unhappycamper comment: IIRC, the Espionage Act of 1917 was put into law to silence those who thought Wilson's march to WW I was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. It tells you a lot that we are dredging up the reign of A. Mitchell Palmer now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC