Ideas for a better world in 2011 (CS Monitor)

[pinto]

Ideas for a better world in 2011

In many ways, 2010 is a year you may want to relegate to the filing cabinet quickly. It began with a massive earthquake in Haiti and wound down with North Korea once again being an enfant terrible – bizarrely trying to conduct diplomacy through brinkmanship.

In between came Toyota recalls and egg scares, pat downs at airports and unyielding unemployment numbers, too little money in the Irish treasury and too many bedbugs in American sheets. Oil gushed from the floor of the Gulf of Mexico for three months, mocking the best intentions of man and technology to stop it, while ash from a volcano in Iceland darkened Europe temporarily as much as its balance sheets.

Yet not all was gloomy. The winter Olympics in Canada and the World Cup in South Africa dazzled with their displays of athletic prowess and national pride, becoming hearths around which the world gathered. In Switzerland, the world's largest atom smasher hurled two protons into each other at unfathomable speeds. Then came the year's most poignant moment – the heroic and improbable rescue of 33 miners from the clutches of the Chilean earth.

There were many transitions, too – the return of the Republicans in Washington and the Tories in Britain, the scaling back of one war (Iraq) and the escalation of another (Afghanistan), the fall of some powers (Greece) and rise of others (China, Germany, Lady Gaga).

To get the new year off to the right start, we decided to ask various thinkers for one idea each to make the world a better place in 2011. We plumbed poets and political figures, physicists and financiers, theologians and novelists. Some of the ideas are provocative, others quixotic. Some you will agree with, others you won't. But in the modest quest to stir a discussion – from academic salons to living rooms to government corridors – we offer these 25 ideas.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/1226/Ideas-for-a-better-world-in-2011/Rolf-Mowatt-Larssen

[RandomThoughts]

1. Pretty sure there already is a global Secret organization.

It came from people that think power denotes 'suppose to have authority'.

Basically the concept is from the belief that if anyone has a group of supporters, or a way to control anything, it must be given by God, so they must be picked to have decisions making power. It is a conclusion that nothing that is could be bad, and as said before is the reason for 'more perfect union' in constitution, since some think everything is already where it should be.

So they went around in secret and got them all on the same page with a few organizations.

And you have secret world government that includes many criminal organizations in secret.



And it is actually proven, since nobody corrected beer and travel money issue, there must be a group setting blacklisting, and there must be a high proportion of people with much money in that group, or that fear that group. Or there are manipulations of information systems.

Some people have stopped by at bar and asked me questions that seemed to be trying to validate something, and matched some odd things that also occurred in news but not about my views or my posts. So I am pretty sure someone was using what I posted and attaching things to make people think differently then my posts. The person that stopped by must be connected, or in same group as history channel PR, since they had a comment on that channel, although still nobody corrected situation so assume that is bad group also, so they are on the inside, but not part of group faking bad information. So even in that group there must be multiple groups, showing that it is probably more cabal then conspiracy.

Could also be ISP filtering, most likely black room at ISP is best guess, NSA or something like that, or just corporate cabal. Could also be that some leaders of theology have had things to say that direct people or suppress information, but that is a long shot, since they would make comments.

My conclusion is that someone is filtering posts for there own benefit against the concepts in posts, that would also match what has been done in other areas, and would explain all the fake posts.

I also would assume, and from what someone said after a military visit locally by a high official years ago, that they also use posts to track people that might try to respond by using a presumed other source. Although linkage of name solves that.

shrug, it is clear they need to be destroyed, but choose not to make that decision, nor claim to be able to. Then again that is what they say what they do when censoring, they think that about me, and think they should filter, since they are opposites.

So it makes sense.

From that guess we will just have to see how it works out.




The most important bit of information is the trending on posting. It will go for awhile on topics about freepers, then will go on education issue, then some other issue. It is like going through many issues, but not in a form that would indicate many posters discussing many issues from many sources, so that indicates a limited structure in what is visible when I view sites, and a small number of posters or systems.