Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean Baker: Changing the terms of economic debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:49 PM
Original message
Dean Baker: Changing the terms of economic debate

Changing the terms of economic debate
As long as we let ourselves be boxed in by a rightwing agenda that leaves us searching for least-worst options, we're losing

Dean Baker
guardian.co.uk, Monday 28 February 2011


There is a new economists' sign-on letter being circulated that warns bad things will happen if there are big cuts to the public investment portion of the federal budget, as Republicans in Congress are now advocating. The argument in the letter is correct, but it is nonetheless painful to see this sort of thing being circulated right now.

The politicians in Washington may have missed it, but we are still in the middle of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. The unemployment rate is still 9.0% and virtually no forecaster, including those in the administration, expects it to return to normal levels any time soon. In addition to the unemployed, we have more than 8 million people underemployed, and millions more who have given up looking for work altogether.

In such times, we might expect that there would be discussion of a big new stimulus programme. After all, we do know how to generate growth and create jobs. As a large and growing body of research shows (pdf), we just have to spend money. This means that tens of millions of people are suffering as a result of unemployment or underemployment simply as a result of bad economic policy.

The politicians who could, in principle, push through more stimulus have been intimidated into silence by the business lobbies and the media which have decided to make concerns about the deficit the top and only economic priority. In this context, it would have been reasonable to expect that a letter drafted by prominent liberal economists (the lead signers include Alan Blinder and Laura Tyson, two of the top economists from the Clinton administration) would centre on the need to boost demand to create jobs. Economists, who don't have to run for office can say such things, even when politicians can't. ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/feb/28/useconomy-usemployment



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. "we are still in the middle of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. "
Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Great Depression
won't look so "great" once we're done with this one.

This country is so far away from fixing its problems it's not funny anymore. All we do in this country is kick each other in the balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. spot on, that...on all counts
We're facing an arduous path, and at this point we're not even acknowledging it exists, which is just making things worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. ".... intimidated into silence by the business lobbies and the media... "
The corporations want the money for themselves, no allocation that doesnt benefit them or their wealthy executives.

Look at how closely these numbers line up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wow......
.... Coincidence? I think not.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Where did you pull this table ...
Do you have a link, or did you grind out the numbers from the budget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Heres the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kweli4Real Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks
It'll prove very useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC