Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From the Top: insider trading may be rampant, from relatively low rungs to the top.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 01:06 PM
Original message
From the Top: insider trading may be rampant, from relatively low rungs to the top.
This week brought news that Rajat Gupta, a longtime senior executive at McKinsey & Company and a former director of Goldman Sachs, is accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission of providing illegal information to Raj Rajaratnam, the founder of the Galleon Group hedge fund who is scheduled for trial next week.

If the charges are true, then the rampant wrongdoing that many suspect in the financial world will have reached one of the most elite boardrooms.

Preet Bharara, the United States attorney who is prosecuting Mr. Rajaratnam for an alleged insider trading scheme, has not charged Mr. Gupta. Since late 2009, he has secured guilty pleas from 29 people for insider trading and charged 17 others. They include high-profile traders, midlevel executives and relatively minor players involved in “expert network” firms that have carried information between traders and companies.

Mr. Gupta and Mr. Rajaratnam met a half-decade ago through their common interest in the Indian School of Business. The S.E.C. alleges that in his role as a Goldman Sachs director, Mr. Gupta learned in September 2008 about Berkshire Hathaway’s not yet public $5 billion investment in Goldman. The morning after, according to a S.E.C. document, “Gupta and Rajaratnam very likely had a telephone conversation.” Shortly after, Galleon tech funds bought more than 80,000 Goldman shares.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/04/opinion/04fri3.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha211
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was a political protest against the SEC, so it is protected as speech.
It's at least as good as the twinky defense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wall Street is the Ponzi scheme.
Those banksters and Wall Street execs are criminals - every single one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But, whatever happens to them? How many see the inside of a prison?
Martha served time, but unless I've missed it, others haven't. A fine, slap on the wrist and they are back to their bonuses.

Prove me wrong. Please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They are. The ones working in the White House should be FIRED first, prosecuted next! n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarburstClock Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Illegal trading is just another manifestation of an entirely illegal way of life
in a country that tortures, lets war criminals and domestic terrorists go free, allows rigged elections, has a massive propaganda network and has a government that actively works against the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. "May" be rampant? I think "Is" rampant is more accurate.
Edited on Sat Mar-05-11 09:22 PM by SharonAnn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wall Street is nothing but a giant scam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cognoscere Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Who would have ever thought it possible, especially after they
threw Martha Stewart in the slammer for lying about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. MAY be rampant? MAY be rampant? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Whoo! That's a good one!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC