Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarence Thomas' Legal Challenges Continue to Build -- Will the Next Come From Congress?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:27 PM
Original message
Clarence Thomas' Legal Challenges Continue to Build -- Will the Next Come From Congress?
Andrew Reinbach.Journalist
Posted: March 15, 2011 11:26 AM
Clarence Thomas' Legal Challenges Continue to Build -- Will the Next Come From Congress?

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) and a group of Congressional Democrats are said to be drafting demands that Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas be disbarred in Missouri for perjury, and investigated by the Department of Justice for bribery, according to House Judiciary Committee aides.

The perjury allegations stem from Justice Thomas' years-long failure to disclose his wife's non-investment income as required by law -- something he's now all but admitted. The accusations of bribery are connected to a $100,000 ad campaign, made during Thomas' 1991 confirmation hearings by the conservative Citizens United group, the allegation being that Justice Thomas repaid Citizens United for helping him get confirmed by ruling in their favor in the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC case.

These Congressional actions, which would likely be released before Congress goes into recess next week, bring to three the number of serious -- and official -- accusations being leveled against Justice Thomas.

Watchdog group Common Cause sent a letter to the Judicial Conference of the U.S. on January 21 asking it to determine if Justice Thomas had violated the Ethics in Government Act when he failed to disclose his wife's income from 2003 to 2009, and refer the matter to the Attorney General's Office if it found the allegation to be true.

More:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-reinbach/clarence-thomas-legal-cha_b_835956.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kudos to Weiner and the rest of them. Thanks for posting n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. He could always get a job with Coke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. there is no way any inquiry of a Repuke will make it out of committee
with THIS House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. And NO Effin SCOTUS Pension either when he leaves!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Judi Lynn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Haven't you heard
If Republicans do it it must be legal. There is no more equal justice under law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC