Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Choice for States: Banks, Not Budget Crises

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:13 AM
Original message
A Choice for States: Banks, Not Budget Crises
from YES! Magazine:




A Choice for States: Banks, Not Budget Crises
7 ways state-owned banks could help states overcome budget deficits and boost their local economies.

by Ellen Brown
posted Mar 25, 2011


Cut spending, raise taxes, sell off public assets—these are the unsatisfactory solutions being debated across the nation, but the budget crises that nearly all the states are now suffering did not arise from too much spending or too little taxation. The crises arose from a credit freeze on Wall Street. In the wake of the 2009 financial market collapse, banks curtailed their lending more sharply than in any year since 1942, driving massive unemployment and causing local tax revenues to plummet.

The logical solution, then, is to restore credit to the local economy. But how? The Federal Reserve could provide the capital and liquidity necessary to create bank credit, in the same way that it provided $12.3 trillion in liquidity and short-term loans to the large money center banks. But Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke declared in January 2011 that the Fed had no intention of doing that—not because it would be too costly (the total deficit of all the states comes to less than two percent of the credit advanced for the bank bailout) but because it is not part of the Fed’s mandate. If Congress wants the Fed to advance credit to local governments, he said, it will have to change the law.

The states are on their own. Policymakers are therefore considering a variety of reforms designed to increase bank lending, particularly to small businesses, the hardest hit by tightening credit standards. One measure that is drawing increasing interest is the creation of a bank modeled on the Bank of North Dakota (BND), currently the only state-owned bank in the country. The BND has a 92-year history of safe, secure and highly profitable banking. North Dakota has the lowest unemployment rate in the country; and in 2009, when other states were floundering, it had the largest budget surplus it had ever had.

Eight states now have bills pending either to form state-owned banks or to do feasibility studies to determine their potential. This year, bills were introduced in the Oregon State legislature on January 11; in Washington State on January 13; in Massachusetts on January 20 (following a 2010 bill that lapsed); and in the Maryland legislature on February 4. They join Illinois, Virginia, Hawaii, and Louisiana, which introduced similar bills in 2010. The Center for State Innovation, based in Madison, Wisconsin, was commissioned to do detailed analyses for Washington and Oregon. Their conclusion was that state-owned banks in those states would have a substantial positive impact on employment, new lending, and state and local government revenue. ..................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.yesmagazine.org/new-economy/a-choice-for-states-banks-not-budget-crises



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Banks dont always make money. Or is this simply a vehicle for fed borrowing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. A State Bank works for North Dakota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Well look at Fannie and Freddie.
If you don't have good lending practices, you can still muck it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. i love YES magazine. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RickFromMN Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder if North Dakota's oil revenue has anything to do with its surplus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Explain why all the other oil revenue states are in deficit
At least in the lower 48.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RickFromMN Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Which states, with oil revenue, have deficits? Are you referring to Texas?

Good question. I only considered the state of North Dakota.

Living in the Fargo/Moorhead area--I would see a lot of North Dakota news.
Fargo is in the Eastern edge of North Dakota while the oil is in the Western part of North Dakota.

The state of Texas automatically comes to mind when one says oil so I did a Google search: Texas low-tax deficit
Imagine my surprise when I learned Texas is a low tax state:
http://lufkindailynews.com/opinion/letters/article_b0186320-4cf8-11e0-a2f6-001cc4c03286.html
http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/node/7803

Can someone, from Texas, confirm, does Texas have a state income tax? My research indicated it did not.
My research indicated it had a sales tax of 6.25%
http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/tax_stru.html
http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/ind_inc.pdf
http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/sales.pdf

I would argue, if you don't bring in enough taxes, you can't pay for the services you need.

Please suggest another state, whose finances, we can examine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. My state has oil revenues and the growing deficit is killing us.
Of course, our new GOPpie Goob helped by fearlessly campaigning to "abolish subsidies" to the sinful Hollywood filmmakers who have been gradually moving here and creating more and more local jobs in response to a minor tax rebate, while utterly ignoring the gigantic subsidies the state provides for the oil companies.

wearily,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. List of all the oil producing states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RickFromMN Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I provided links why people are saying North Dakota is in surplus.

Do you dispute those links?

Do you dispute, if a state is in deficit, the state is spending more than getting in tax revenue?

Do you think oil companies should be getting subsidies?
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/united-states/text-house-democrats-end-subsidies-for-oil-and-gas-52142.html
Do you agree or disagree with the article, "House Democrats: End Subsidies for Oil and Gas"?

If you are truly curious, you need to help with the research rather than try to sandbag me.
Sandbagging me will not change the information on the links I find.
Sandbagging me will only cause me to question what you believe and why you are here.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-30-11 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. This is a separate issue--of course oil companies shouldn't need subsidies
Irrelevant to the issue of a state bank. All oil producing states other than ND have had plenty of bank failures. ND has had none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC