Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CTJ: "Gang of Six" Plan would reduce revenue and encourage corporate tax dodging (PLEASE READ)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:06 PM
Original message
CTJ: "Gang of Six" Plan would reduce revenue and encourage corporate tax dodging (PLEASE READ)
http://ctj.org/ctjreports/2011/07/gang_of_six_plan_would_reduce_revenue_and_encourage_corporate_tax_dodging.php


The plan released yesterday by the “Gang of Six” U.S. Senators to reduce the budget deficit includes revenue measures that would actually
increase the deficit. The document says that the“tax reform” provisions in the plan would reduce revenue by $1.5 trillion by 2021 compared to the Congressional Budget Office’s current law baseline. This means the plan would reduce taxes compared to what would happen under current law if Congress simply does nothing.

Senators Hope that Manipulation of Baselines Will Be Too Arcane for Media or Public to Understand

How can these Senators justify including tax cuts in a plan that has the ostensible purpose of reducing the deficit? They use a common, if deceptive, accounting gimmick. They not only compare their plan to “current law” but also to an alternative baseline that assumes that the Bush income tax cuts have been made permanent for incomes below $250,000 for married couples and below $200,000 for unmarried taxpayers, and also assumes that the Bush estate tax cut has partially been made permanent. In other words, they compare their plan to what would happen if Congress makes permanent 81 percent of the Bush tax cuts, which are scheduled to expire at the end of 2012 under current law. Compared to this assumption that Congress will enact a permanent Bush tax cut extension that Congress has never enacted, the tax reform envisioned in the Gang of Six plan would raise an asserted $1 trillion over a decade.“Whatever you think about tax cuts, we should all agree that they are not part of deficit reduction,” said Robert S. McIntyre, director of Citizens for Tax Justice. “Comparing a plan with tax cuts to even larger tax cuts that Congress has never enacted does not magically make the plan a revenue generator."


The plan would exempt profits shifted to corporate tax havens.

http://www.ctj.org/pdf/gangofsix.pdf
The "Gang of Six" plan would actually increase the deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who would unrec this?
Stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The Gang of Fanboys and Fangirls. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Its smoke, mirrors and huge tax cuts for the rich
I can't believe that the gang of six plan can cut the top rate from 35% to 29%, cut the corporate tax rate by a third, mandate that any loophole closing would have to go to lowering the rates, and exempt every cent multinationals earn abroad can lead to an increase in revenue, unless they are going to rape the wide part of the pyramid with the cuts to the charitable donation, employer provided health care, mortgage interest and 401K write offs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. We are being manipulated.


K and R



:hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is fucking insanity n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would start calling it the Gang Bang Of 6
but it might get deleted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have emailed my Senators and Congressman..this needs to stop.
Two years ago I would have said no way in hell would this be possible under Obama.

Thanks for the link.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. great post. the gang of 6 plan encourages off-shoring of operations/jobs
Plan Would Exempt Corporate Profits Shifted to Tax Havens

Because our tax system allows U.S. corporations to indefinitely “defer” U.S. taxes on their offshore profits, it already encourages corporations to move jobs overseas and to disguise their U.S. profits as “foreign” profits by shifting them to tax havens.

There would be even more incentives for corporations to do both these bad things under the“territorial” tax system promoted by corporate lobbyists and included in the Gang of Six plan.
(more)


recommended!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC