Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox News ratings speak for themselves: so what are smart people watching?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 02:55 PM
Original message
Fox News ratings speak for themselves: so what are smart people watching?
We live in highly publicized political times, where networks, publications, blogs, podcasts, tweets and more feed us a daily stream of information revolving around the state of our country and its place in the world.

One such entity: Fox News, the bastion of Right-wing conservative media that has steadily increased its viewership and following since the early days of the G.W. Bush Presidency (what with all of its diplomatic controversy in dire need of positive spin in the public eye and all).

The “Fair and Balanced” network, ironically home to strictly-conservative-only pundits such as Hannity, Beck, O’Reilly, Dobbs, Ingraham, Morris and more recently Palin and Huckabee, enjoys overwhelming ratings for its nightly “news” programs when compared to competitor networks like CNN, MSNBC and CBS as well as American audiences of internationally-based BBC and Associated Press (AP).

A recent ratings analysis by Media Bistro (and subsequently lauded by conservative blog Newsbusters.org – that oh-so-credible watchdog of media bias that simply ignores its own anti-progressive slant and abhorrence to history) shows how Fox is seemingly trampling the competition amongst American audiences, particularly in the political arena.

But with the state of media and entertainment reflecting our educational mindset in this country being what it is, how reputable are high ratings? While I am not arguing against Fox’s ratings-dominance, I am also not surprised. Why? Because sometimes (most times) the loudest, most sensational voices, while disregarding reason and accountability, draw the biggest crowds.

full: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/07/24/fox-news-ratings-speak-for-themselves-so-what-are-smart-people-watching/

The Media bistro report: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/07/24/fox-news-ratings-speak-for-themselves-so-what-are-smart-people-watching/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. ABF - Anything But Fux
Edited on Sun Jul-24-11 03:03 PM by FreakinDJ
FUX isn't even in the running

“NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams” was #1 again, with #2 ABC “World News with Diane Sawyer” cutting its gaps with “Nightly” in both Total Viewers (-52% / 349,000 vs. 725,000 million) and A25-54 viewers (-4% / 374,000 vs. 390,000) compared to last year. Thursday’s “World News” was the #1 evening newscast, outperforming “Nightly” by 106,000 Total
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/evening-news-ratings-week-of-july-4_b75977
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. The smart people I know don't have a TV at all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fox News (Entertainment). The TV equivalent of the News of the World. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cool Logic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe the amount of influence Fox News has is overblown.
There are ratings in another post that show NBC, ABC and others have higher ratings.

The audience for cable/sat is much smaller than that of the Network News Agencies. This smaller audience off-sets their ratings lead on cable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Native Donating Member (885 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. People of low and average intelligence significantly outnumber those of higher intelligence -
that's why I'm not surprised at this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. they breed faster...
Edited on Sun Jul-24-11 04:26 PM by awoke_in_2003
"Idiocracy" isn't far off.

on edit: It would be cool, though, to see the president addressing congress and telling them to "Sit their monkey asses down"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFyUvlfZ8j0

South Carolina, what's up :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. They aren't watching TV at all
They are on the Net. You can get far more up to the minute news on this than on TV, and without bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC