Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress' mishandling of debt ceiling and deficit is surreal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:02 AM
Original message
Congress' mishandling of debt ceiling and deficit is surreal
OpEd to CNN by Suze Orman. She annoys the daylights out of me, but has a loyal (R) following on CBNC. Maybe the teahadists will listen to her.

Watching Washington hold our economy hostage the past few weeks, as it refuses to reach a compromise deal on deficit reduction so we can raise the debt ceiling, has been beyond frustrating. Surreal is more like it.

Here is what Congress has gotten so horribly wrong:

First, if you spend it, you have to pay it back.

As we all know, if you run up a balance on your credit card and then decide not to pay the bill, there's a huge price to pay. Your interest rate goes up, your credit score goes down and that triggers all sorts of costly dominoes to start falling. To not raise the debt ceiling is akin to refusing to pay your credit card bill. The debt ceiling has nothing to do with future spending. It's simply a mechanism that allows the U.S. government to keep paying off the bills it has already run up. This is a completely separate issue from what we decide is the right pace of future spending for our country. The deficit reduction debate is about that future path. That anyone insists on linking the two is absurd. We must make good on paying off our bills.

Second, we've already hurt our credit score.

The fact that America has a pristine AAA-credit rating is like saying it has a really strong FICO credit score. It enables our country to qualify for great borrowing terms. But the rating agencies are now warning that our credit rating may be reduced, even if we raise the debt ceiling.
Why? Because we've yet to make any serious attempt to reduce our long-term deficit. That is, even without a default, the fact is our national finances are such a mess that investors here and abroad may likely start demanding we pay more interest when we borrow. It's like our FICO score drops from great to just solid.

An estimate from the Congressional Budget Office is that even if our borrowing costs rose just one-tenth of a percentage point, it could translate into $130 billion more in what we owe over the next 10 years. We will have Washington dithering to thank for that.
All of this would be frustrating enough if it were happening at a time when our economy was on solid footing. Yet we just heard that the rate of economic growth the past two quarters has been incredibly low, and we have nearly 25 million Americans either unemployed or stuck working part-time.

Here's what is so truly absurd: We wouldn't have a deficit crisis, if we had more people working. The revenue that would come from halving our unemployment rate would reduce our long-term debt to manageable levels. Seems to me that's the sort of policy debate Congress should be having right about now: What's the best way to get more Americans working? When was the last time you heard a peep out of Washington about that?


http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/07/30/orman.debt.ceiling/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yup...
Can anyone name a country that has used austerity to get OUT of an economic downturn?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarlib Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sure, the UK, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain. Haven't you
heard it's working really well.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. She may have a loyal ( R) following, but she supports Democrats. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not what I meant. She has been with her lesbian partner for many, many years now in a state
where it isn't close to being made official and is probably one of the best in the nation in being able to explain the financial burdens same sex couples have to deal with as opposed to married opposet sex couples.

She is just a little too over the top in her presentation style for me - which plays to the LIV set. I do not disagree with her advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. End the wars; let the Bush/Obama tax cuts expire...
Edited on Sun Jul-31-11 05:01 AM by KansDem
Tax US corporations...

Problem solved.

I don't know why a neophyte has to keep explaining the obvious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And fund programs to rebuild bridges, highways, and construct veterans housing.
And VOILA! the nation is working again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomThom Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-11 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. good jobs would be good
you have to go where the money is if you need some
tax the rich more not less
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC