Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Less Work, More Living

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:26 AM
Original message
Less Work, More Living

from YES! Magazine:



Less Work, More Living
Working fewer hours could save our economy, save our sanity, and help save our planet.

by Juliet Schor
posted Aug 31, 2011


Millions of Americans have lost control over the basic rhythm of their daily lives. They work too much, eat too quickly, socialize too little, drive and sit in traffic for too many hours, don’t get enough sleep, and feel harried too much of the time. It’s a way of life that undermines basic sources of wealth and well-being—such as strong family and community ties, a deep sense of meaning, and physical health.

Imagining a world in which jobs take up much less of our time may seem utopian, especially now, when a scarcity mentality dominates the economic conversation. People who are employed often find it difficult to scale back their jobs. Costs of medical care, education, and child care are rising. It may be hard to find new sources of income when U.S. companies have been laying people off at a dizzying rate.

But fewer work hours for people with jobs is a key step toward solving the unemployment crisis—while giving Americans healthier lives. Fewer hours means more jobs are available to people who need them. Living on less pay usually means consuming less, making more of the things one needs at home, and living lighter, whether by design or by accident.

Today, driven both by necessity and the deliberate choice to live simply, more Americans are shifting toward fewer work hours. It’s a trend that, if done correctly, could get us out of our current economic crisis and away from unsustainable economic growth. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/new-livelihoods/less-work-more-living



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. This brings to mind my father's favorite saying,
"wish in one hand, shit in the other, and see which one fills up first".

I think that many of us who are working or looking for work would be willing to work less and find some small enjoyments in our life, but the bosses of the world keep that from happening. I cannot even imagine what my boss would say if I requested less hours, even if it did involve less pay. He keeps wanting more and more, so our society seems to be going in the wrong direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Some body gets it! We don't need more work.
Years ago, on this very forum, I called for a 20 hour work week. A few times. Never goes anywhere. I am more in favor of a 0 hour work week now.

Concisely, automation eliminates jobs. How do those eliminated participate in an economy that is work based?

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WingDinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. employers dont want to foot the bill for benefits for part timers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Of course they don't want to.
How does that matter? Government is about setting rules that improve the general welfare.

Employers don't want (with good reason) to be the first one to volunteer to make the change for the greater good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sentath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-01-11 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Which brings us neatly around to non-employer based healthcare,
which our last round of health insurance reform did not address, that I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC