Mossback
What If Bush ‘Wins’?
Sure, hope for the best. But we better have a plan if we get four more years.
July 14 - 20, 2004
It is almost a relief to hear the other shoe drop. This week, Newsweek reported that the Bush administration is considering a mechanism to delay the November election in case of a terrorist attack.
What a surprise.
According to the magazine, the Department of Homeland Security has asked the Justice Department to analyze what steps would have to be taken to postpone the election in the event it is disrupted by terrorism. Officials say they are looking at ways to “secure” the election. For whom do they want to secure it?
This follows Tom Ridge’s announcement last week that so-called “chatter” suggests that Al Qaeda wants to mess up our electoral process, and officials pointed to what happened with the train bombings in Spain. But the election process wasn’t disrupted in Spain—it went forward and resulted in a regime change that was odious to the Bush administration. That might qualify as interference in the internal politics of Spain, but it was not interference in the election itself.
Federal elections in America must be inviolable, as reliable as sunrise. As faulty as the system is, and as corrupt as the process was in 2000, it nevertheless is the one means that we have to control our destiny. Our elections should be bombproof and bulletproof (and, by the way, Florida-proof). Voting is certainly as sacred as shopping, which Bush exhorted us to do in the wake of 9/11, despite our fears.
(more)
http://www.seattleweekly.com/features/0428/040714_news_mossback.php