Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your Social Media Will Be Monitored

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
hue Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:25 AM
Original message
Your Social Media Will Be Monitored
Source: The Atlantic Wire

Let's face it: the world is more Orwellian than it used to be. With technological innovations in the past ten years alone--social media, smartphones, widespread Wi-Fi--we're able to communicate more often, more publicly and more traceably than ever before, and the notion of the government watching what we're saying scares the heck out of a lot of people. The New York Federal Reserve Bank is the latest organization to express interests in monitoring social media. This week, Fast Company confirmed the Fed's plans to hire a firm to conduct "sentiment analysis" on social networks around the world, but despite what you might read on conspiracy theory blogs, it's not as Big Brother-ish as it sounds.
In September, a document leaked online and posted in full below revealing details of how the Fed wants to keep a virtual finger on the public's pulse. In requesting proposals for a "Sentiment Analysis and Social Media Monitoring Solution," the Fed wants to hire a company that can "monitor billions of conversations," "handle crisis situations" as well as "identify and reach out to key bloggers and influencers." The monitoring isn't meant help guide the Fed's policy decisions but rather improve its public relations--and if you've been watching the GOP debates or paying attention to Occupy Wall Street protests, you'll know that the Fed is elbow deep in bad press lately. A representative from the Fed told Fast Company of their plan, "The reason for contemplating such an effort is to get a better sense of the relevant concerns and discussions that are taking place in the public domain in order to improve our communications and engagement with the public."

Read more: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2011/10/your-social-media-will-be-monitored/43577/



There will be no such thing as privacy in the years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Already SOP for all big businesses and institutions. They're decades beyond mere 1984.
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 10:29 AM by leveymg
We've become so convinced that universal surveillance is so normal that we now give them all our information freely. We love Facebook, GOOGLE, and Twitter - we love Big Brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. If you publicly post something on the internet, it's already not private.
I'm not sure why so many people don't realize that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Like DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Be aware that the source of this is The Atlantic, owned by neo-con David Bradley.
Bradley, who has described himself as "a neocon guy" who came to regret his support for the Iraq invasion,<10> hired James Bennet as editor, who had been the Jerusalem bureau chief for The New York Times. He also hired writers including Jeffrey Goldberg and Andrew Sullivan.

The Atlantic Wire is a website<11> associated with The Atlantic that aggregates opinion<12> from across the media spectrum and summarizes significant positions in each debate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Atlantic_Wire#The_Atlantic_Wire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I never doubted it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tawadi Donating Member (631 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. PATRIOT Act = no more privacy
Been that way for some time I imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. IMHO, there hasn't been privacy since the Patriot act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC