Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exit Bush, exit strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
NV1962 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 06:06 PM
Original message
Exit Bush, exit strategy
From my blog:


The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that Colin Powell's prediction should come true -- in the narrow sense -- about Bush 'owning' Iraq by invading it. As much as I try, I can't even detect a hint at a possible willingness among European governments to shift in attitude when John Kerry becomes the 44th President.

I'm afraid that President Kerry will face essentially the same stubborn refusal to pour heaps of money, let alone commit anywhere near a substantial amount of troops to peacekeeping in Iraq, not even under the UN flag.

Barring a profound change in course -- which seems very unlikely at this point, given John Kerry's statements so far -- the war in Iraq is well on its way to become a trillion dollar war (yes, that's 1,000 billion!) Presently, there are well over 100,000 US troops in Iraq. That is where the specter of a reintroduced draft comes from.

If that series of forward looking statements is anywhere near accurate, it means that the US and its taxpaying citizens will face the bill practically alone. Leaving the potential political value aside of gaining the UN's seal of approval for a new 'internationalized' peacekeeping mandate, for example to demonstrate the Kerry administration's renewed commitment to seeking international consensus, I have major doubts that the contributions from allies will be sufficient to allow a substantial reduction from the current level of committed US assets in Iraq, in both money and personnel.

And that bears very unappealing gifts, that add significant risk to the otherwise already immense field of problems that the Kerry administration is going to face, come next January. I sincerely doubt that such additional baggage can be taken in the stride. The mere idea that the Kerry administration could end up in convulsions from the poisoned fruit of the Bush administration is simultaneously absurd and unacceptable.

So why keep on suffering, when the Iraqis themselves are clamoring for a swift retreat of US troops from Iraq? Remaining in place, in search of an unlikely pacification over at least the next two years, will have a tremendous cost. And frankly, I see little redeeming value in valiant persistence to right the profoundly wrong war of the Bush administration.

In essence, I'm tilting heavily toward cut & walk off: devise a 2-year plan to retreat, compile a substantial aid & compensation package of -- say -- $50bn, and let History remember the Bush administration for its failed, pointless and costly war.

I believe it's far more preferable to liquidate the Iraqi legacy of George W Bush upfront, than to suffer the devastating consequences of a chronic and debilitating affliction. In fact, I reckon that it is ultimately in the interest of the United States and its people to let the international community deal with the logical consequences of its own incessant criticism of the Bush administration - no matter how justified. After all, there are plenty of European countries that have a major stake in a stable Iraq. I don't think it'd take much to convince them to take over most of the US' burden.

Liquidate, liquidate, liquidate: the sooner that certainly bitter 'solution' is embraced, the sooner a sense of clarity (and relief) can take over, to dedicate the most of the nation's precious resources to the many sore domestic spots, left by four years of Bush's outrageous irresponsibility. The country survived the trauma of Vietnam; I see no good reason whatsoever to engage in a similar long-lasting and ultimately extremely costly effort, with so many more pressing challenges facing the Kerry administration at home.

Let Iraq be a stark reminder of the perils of fighting remote wars, following a dubious and blind ideology. Indeed: stick the broken pieces to the far-right Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-28-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I got a simpler one..
Edited on Wed Jul-28-04 06:12 PM by physioex
Don't let the do' hit yo' ass on the way out.....Let them have the money, just let us have our lives. By the time the election is over well over 1,000 casualties in Iraq and thousands of civilians dead. Money is just a figment of our imagination, lives cannot be replaced...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC