Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What We Missed in Boston

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:11 AM
Original message
What We Missed in Boston
The following at least addresses some of the cable coverage adding to the shame of the quality of information being broadcast to the American public about the the election of a president. Shame! Shame!

What We Missed in Boston

By ALESSANDRA STANLEY

Published: August 1, 2004


EOPLE, particularly network anchors, complain that conventions are too tailored to television. Actually, they are not tailored enough. If the parties really wanted the networks to give them gavel-to-gavel coverage, they would cut the event down to one night, not select a nominee in advance, and let viewers call in and, as they do on the Fox Network hit, vote for their favorite speaker - Convention Idol.

snip

So, are Americans getting the convention coverage they deserve? Or are the television networks shirking the civic responsibility that was implicit when the government gave them the airwaves and let them rake in billions off a public trust?

snip

Instead, viewers got the television equivalent of the modern paperback - from the Nicholson Baker-novel obsessiveness of "ABC News Now" to the fluffy, self-absorbed novellas of anchors interviewing each other on MSNBC and Fox News. The enlightened viewer could design do-it-yourself reportage - a little C-Span and PBS, some CNN and an hour on a network on prime time. (Most Americans chose to tune out completely.) Television is a passive medium. It would have been nice to have the option of letting a trusted network anchor make those choices.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/01/weekinreview/01stan.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. We watched all coverage on CSPAN, period, and taped it and
replayed it. To #ell with the talking heads.

We did tune in to Fox briefly, AFTERWORDS, for about 20 minutes on Monday and Thursday. It seemed to me they were struggling to find something to knock, and boy did I love that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
holly73 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Have to love CSPAN :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-31-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Conventions and awards shows bore me to death.
I watched Edwards' and Kerry's speeches and that's it.That's all that mattered.

The rest was all theatre!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC