Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Editorial: The Faith-Based Missile Shield

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 06:35 AM
Original message
NYT Editorial: The Faith-Based Missile Shield
The Bush administration's exorbitantly wasteful missile defense system is about to be formally activated, just in time for its immediate bull's-eye: Election Day. Despite widespread technological doubts, President Bush promised in 2000 to have a missile shield in place this November. So, even though the $130 billion spent so far has yet to produce anything like a battle-ready system, the Pentagon plans to pronounce it active this month at a half dozen new missile silos on the West Coast.

This wisp of the old Star Wars fever dream is bedeviled by missing components and unproven premises. The Pentagon has suspended normal accountability standards in favor of what military proponents euphemistically term "evolutionary acquisition." This means spend and build now, and attempt credible tests when and if all the parts finally arrive. Even a Pentagon analysis called it a "case study" against rushing forward on faith.

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/10/opinion/10sun2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. $130 billion, here, and $130 billion there, and soon you can't pay Soc Sec
because of that deficit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. All they've produced so far is spectacular contrails ...
... or whatever they're called on a missile. But you can't hit a bullet with a bullet, as someone pointed out, not even if you're using really big "bullets."

It's one incredible waste of money and resources, all for Ronald Reagan's Buck Rogers fantasy.

We were supposed to get a "peace dividend" when the Berlin Wall came down and the USSR fell apart. However thanks to Bush-Cheney-Rove-Rumsfeld-Halliburton it's all evaporated into a new arms race -- and without the USSR as an adversary equal to the US, our Mayberry Machiavellians, our Masters of War, simply invented some new and virulent adversaries and called them the Axis of Evil.

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC