Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Kinsley-The Cult of the Source

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 11:15 AM
Original message
Michael Kinsley-The Cult of the Source

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-kinsley10oct10,1,6149248.column

The Cult of the Source
Michael Kinsley

October 10, 2004

The reporters being subpoenaed over who leaked an undercover CIA operative's name and those facing actual jail time for refusing to reveal their sources are friends of mine. Or at least they were until this column. I do not want them to go to jail.

The problem is this: Should it be illegal for a government official to reveal the identity of an undercover CIA agent? Most reasonable people, including most reporters, would probably say yes. Lives can be at stake. But for all practical purposes, such a law (which in fact we have) is unenforceable if a government official chooses to reveal the agent's identity to a journalist, and the journalist ignores a subpoena to testify about it.

One of the farcical aspects of this investigation, conducted by a special prosecutor and costing millions of dollars, is that there is no mystery. At least half a dozen prominent people know for sure who did the leaking. Just reading the newspapers, it sure seems as if everyone in Washington thinks one of the leakers is some guy in the vice president's office named Skippy, or Snapper. Or something.

"Everyone in Washington thinks" is a good enough standard for most purposes. But not for a criminal prosecution. For that, you need evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. And if the crime consists of a private conversation between two people, you need at least one of them to 'fess up. The government official is protected against self-incrimination by the 5th Amendment. If the journalist has an absolute right and an absolute duty to shield the identity of a source, both sides of the conversation are immune and prosecution is impossible.

continued

PS...he doesn't think these journalists should
hide the source this time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. me too.
Novak helped pull the trigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. That does lay it out clearly -
Seems to me that journalists could be held equally accountable for outing CIA people and at least that way someone who could be prosecuted would be accountable.

It would also give prosecutors a plea bargaining chip in being able to get the source.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good Find
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-10-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5.  OOps! The Link Is For The Plame Thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. This article is a great read. Kinsley poses an interesting question about
"media rights." When is it a good thing and when not..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC