Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fahrenheit - Gold and Oil! A DU Must Read...ties together some loose ends

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:24 PM
Original message
Fahrenheit - Gold and Oil! A DU Must Read...ties together some loose ends
(Thanks to DU'er "54 a Nickle" for this post. I stole it from Ozy's "Stock Market Watch" column here on "DU LBN Forum." Thought it would be interesting to many DU'ers...:shrug:)


Fahrenheit - Gold and Oil

Bill Ridley
OnlineInvestorsNews Volume M9-12, October, 2004
www.jameswinston.com
Posted October 11, 2004

Crude futures close above $51 for the first time ever on the New York Mercantile Exchange. November crude rose $1.18 to close at $51.09 a barrel, eclipsing the previous closing record of $50.12 seen on Friday. Lingering production delays in the Gulf of Mexico, tension in Nigeria, and uncertainty ahead of Wednesday's U.S. petroleum supply updates fueled the rally. -CBS Marketwatch, October 5th, 2004

One of the optimum strategies of becoming a good investor is knowing in advance how global political agendas will shape the market in the coming months and years ahead. When George W. Bush was first elected president, I knew and publicly announced defense, gold, and oil stocks would rise.

I also knew the invasion of Iraq was on the drawing board, and I will remind you, this was before George W. Bush took power and before the tragic events of 9/11.

I'm certainly not a great psychic or political scientist - I just read the game plan in advance. The agenda was clearly spelled out back in 1997 by a group who created the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). This organization of neoconservatives includes a number of current White House insiders including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, and Paul Wolfowitz.

The PNAC believe the United States needs to take greater measures to assert its dominance as a world leader. Their belief is that by taking a more liberal or diplomatic stance, the United States and the world at large will not progress and benefit from globalization in our time. Consequently taking more active, and if need be, more forceful roles in world affairs, the objectives of attaining a new world order can be reached.

When it comes to the matter of securing Mid East oil supplies, the PNAC made their feelings known in a letter to President Clinton in 1998 where they urged his administration to set in motion a plan to remove Saddam Hussein from power which would secure "our vital interests in the Gulf" that hold "a significant portion of the world's supply of oil."


MORE of this interesting read which combines LIHOP/MIHOP/and down to earth speculation....
http://www.321gold.com/editorials/ridley/ridley101104.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Credit goes to Poster "54 a Nickle" for this one.... but..Thanks!
I'll pass it along. :-)'s
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is great....
it ties together everything I touched on a year or so ago in a paper published for globalfreepress.com, "World War IV and the Coming Oil Crisis." I wonder what the size of the circulation is for OnlineInvestorNews?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Politicians and media refuse to attribute power over Mideast oil as motive
Just amazes me how there is so much ongoing deliberate denial of the role of controlling the oil supply in the motivation to invade Iraq.

Good article!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC