Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times: Making 'Liberal' a Fighting Word Again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 03:20 PM
Original message
LA Times: Making 'Liberal' a Fighting Word Again
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/2004/la-na-liberal15oct15,1,4023120.story?coll=la-home-headlines

THE RACE FOR THE WHITE HOUSE

Making 'Liberal' a Fighting Word Again
By Janet Hook
Times Staff Writer

October 15, 2004

WASHINGTON — A key part of President Bush's message for the final weeks of the campaign is starting to sound like a schoolyard taunt: Kerry is a liberal! Kerry is a liberal!

Democrat John F. Kerry's response at the final presidential debate Wednesday sometimes sounded like the political equivalent of: So? You wanna make something of it?

Kerry has unflinchingly embraced the liberal pillars of the Great Society and the New Deal, calling for an expansion of Medicaid, keeping Social Security in its current form, and using the levers of government to help the middle class and the disadvantaged. He has backed higher taxes for the rich, affirmative action and an increase in the minimum wage.

(snip)

The Bush campaign is betting that by focusing on his most liberal views, it can do to Kerry what Bush's father did to Michael S. Dukakis in the 1988 campaign — portray the Democratic nominee as too left-wing to lead a country with values more traditional than those in his native Massachusetts. That is a shift from the Bush campaign's monthslong effort to portray Kerry as an indecisive flip-flopper and to undercut his credibility as a potential commander-in-chief.

(snip)

The outcome of the election will hinge, in part, on whether the liberal label will be as much of a boogeyman as it was in 1988. Republican former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who has been urging the Bush camp to take this line of attack against Kerry, is confident it can be. "No Democrat has been defined as an open liberal and won a presidential election since 1964," he said. "Kerry says labels are misleading because he understands labels are the end of his campaign."

(snip)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. What about Al Gore winning in 2000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. even when they tell truth they lie
it's maybe impossible for these mediawhores to be honest w/out lying....gore won the 2k election, asshole, and all the fukken lying on earth will not change that...
the 'chimp-in-charge' you mean! oh jeesus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC