With endorsements like these, who needs.....

[Tesibria]

I (sorta) LOVE it -- except for the outcome.

In "Rep Endorsement: Re-elect Bush; Kerry fails to make case", the (Ohio) Canton Repository selects Bush, even tho....

(clips)

The president took the country to war in Iraq without clear need to do so. The biggest problem with Bush’s Iraq policy, however, has been his team’s inability to foresee or prevent the great difficulties of the U.S. occupation following victory. Kerry says he would have done things differently. That doesn’t help the United States now.
...
Bush has been narrow in his views toward science, intrusive in public education and tolerant of an inclination within his administration to shrink civil liberties. To help fix that latter point, Bush should thank John Ashcroft for four years of service and look for a new attorney general.
...

[pacalo]

1. Oh yeah, that's a real mandate:

We endorse a second term for the coWard & we're taking a leap of faith that he'll doing everything different.

Lots of common sense in that rationalization; kind of reminds me of Ricardo-Mertz logic.

[Catt03]

2. Can these editorials be any more pathetic

Like Bush gives a damm what they think about him.

:puke:

[emulatorloo]

3. "He's been a horrible president, but if we re-elect him, he will change"

That's right up there with "Maybe if we have a baby together it will save our marriage."

[DemBones DemBones]

5. LOL, good analogy!

:kick:

[dennis4868]

4. Makes no sense.....

They are pretty much saying Bush fucked up our country and the world but because it is too late for any changes in Iraq DONT VOTE FOR KERRY!

WTF?