Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anatomy of a crushing political defeat by Arianna Huffington

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 01:26 PM
Original message
Anatomy of a crushing political defeat by Arianna Huffington
http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=18029

Anatomy of a crushing political defeat
Arianna Huffington - Arianna Online

11.04.04 - This election was not stolen. It was lost by the Kerry campaign.

The reason it's so important to make this crystal clear -- even as Kerry's concession speech is still ringing in our ears -- is that to the victors go not only the spoils but the explanations. And the Republicans are framing their victory as the triumph of conservative moral values and the wedge cultural issues they exploited throughout the campaign.

But it wasn't gay marriage that did the Democrats in; it was the fatal decision to make the pursuit of undecided voters the overarching strategy of the Kerry campaign.

This meant that at every turn the campaign chose caution over boldness so as not to offend the undecideds who, as a group, long to be soothed and reassured rather than challenged and inspired.

The fixation on undecided voters turned a campaign that should have been about big ideas, big decisions, and the very, very big differences between the worldviews of John Kerry and George Bush -- both on national security and domestic priorities -- into a narrow trench war fought over ludicrous non-issues like whether Kerry had bled enough to warrant a Purple Heart.

This timid, spineless, walking-on-eggshells strategy -- with no central theme or moral vision -- played right into the hands of the Bush-Cheney team's portrayal of Kerry as an unprincipled, equivocating flip-flopper who, in a time of war and national unease, stood for nothing other than his desire to become president.

http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=18029
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sister moon Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. ouch.
But I have to agree nonetheless. Let's take that lesson with us to 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. the lesson
Arianna is spot on in my opinion. She closes with what now . . .

http://www.workingforchange.com/printitem.cfm?itemid=18029

So the question inevitably becomes: What now?

Already there are those in the party convinced that, in the interest of expediency, Democrats need to put forth more "centrist" candidates -- i.e. Republican-lite candidates -- who can make inroads in the all-red middle of the country.

I'm sorry to pour salt on raw wounds, but isn't that what Tom Daschle did? He even ran ads showing himself hugging the president! But South Dakotans refused to embrace this lily-livered tactic. Because, ultimately, copycat candidates fail in the way "me-too" brands do.

Unless the Democratic Party wants to become a permanent minority party, there is no alternative but to return to the idealism, boldness and generosity of spirit that marked the presidencies of FDR and JFK and the short-lived presidential campaign of Bobby Kennedy.

Otherwise, the Republicans will continue their winning ways, convincing tens of millions of hard working Americans to vote for them even as they cut their services and send their children off to die in an unjust war.

Democrats have a winning message. They just have to trust it enough to deliver it. This time they clearly didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not convinced it's that simple
Massive deployment of touch-screen voting machines, with absolutely no paper trail, or any other possible way to verify their results, seems like the elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about.

I think we should all follow this study with great interest:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x19390
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Absolutely correct
We need to stop worrying so much about the "swing" voters; don't they have the same concerns as other people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carl Brennan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Absolute BS!
This election was stolen when you look at the royal shiisthouse mess the voting process is in and how it ALWAYS benefits the Repukes.


Check it out:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1316010&mesg_id=1316010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. This was hardly a "crushing political defeat." 51%-49% is practically...
a tie, even if you believe there was no voter fraud.

I like Arianna, but her own run for the California governorship went nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC