Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condi Rice as Secretary of State is causing dismay in Europe.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 08:11 AM
Original message
Condi Rice as Secretary of State is causing dismay in Europe.
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 08:18 AM by glarius
Eric Margolis, an American mid-east expert living in Toronto, who writes for the Toronto Sun has written another excellent article; this time concerning Bush's choice of Condoleeza Rice as Secretary of State. Margolis, a Republican, has been against the Iraq war from the beginning and has written many articles critical of the Bush administration....
<snip>
"In my view, Rice, an academic Soviet expert, has been the worst national security adviser since the Reagan administration's bumbling William Clark, whose only foreign affairs experience, wags said, came from eating at the International House of Pancakes."
<snip>
"The image of Condi Rice and George Bush sitting at the White House piano singing Onward Christian Soldiers is unsettling Europe, which thought Bush II might restore America to its traditional multilateral foreign policy. Even Bush's faithful British retainer, Tony Blair, is looking increasingly unhappy."

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Toronto/Eric_Margolis/2004/11/21/724223.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. This may help Europe to become more unified against the threat we pose
to world political and economic stability. She's just another catalyst prompting them to act in her best interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed Up Donating Member (443 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. it doesn't matter if he makes Herman Goering the Sec'y of State
Because Kerry didn't win the election. Can anything be worse than that? Nothing else matters now. We lost the Great War, so any skirmishes after that like who is going to be the new secretary of state don't amount to a hill of beans.

Fuck Europe, their press always gives Bush the benefit of the doubt. Every time I read Le Monde or watch the BBC they are always acting like Bush is deserving or he is some kind of great leader.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
non sociopath skin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Try changing your French paper to Liberation, Fed Up.
You won't see much adulation for Shrub there.

The Skin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. there was a thread about Putin starting a new alliance..
with India, China, and Brazil. Anyone see that one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Is there an English version?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. New National Security Advisor: nuclear war advocate
http://www.counterpunch.org/barry11202004.html

The Rise of Stephen Hadley
The Vulcans Consolidate Power
By TOM BARRY


<snip>Hadley participated in the National Institute for Public Policy's study team that produced Rationale and Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Forces and Arms Control, a study that called for the development of "mini"-nuclear weapons and served as a road map for George W. Bush's Nuclear Posture Review. The report advocated the use of bunker-busting nuclear weapons even against non-nuclear countries to rid rogue nations of any weapons of mass destruction, such as stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons. Prefiguring the preventive national security doctrine of the Bush administration, the report stated: "Under certain circumstances very severe nuclear threats may be needed to deter any of these potential adversaries."

Hadley advocates extending the role of nuclear weapons to include deterrence against all so-called weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological weapons. He wrote...<snip> ... It is often an unstated premise in the current debate that if nuclear weapons are needed at all, they are needed only to deter the nuclear weapons of others. I am not sure this unstated premise is true.<snip>

<Like his former boss Condoleezza Rice, Hadley is an administration loyalist who faithfully supported the national security policies of the first administration--even to the extent of supporting claims that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons and had ties with al-Qaida when the CIA had repeatedly warned that such charges were not backed by hard intelligence.

With his longtime personal and professional contacts with Rumsfeld and Cheney, Hadley served as one of the key points of contact with the National Security Council for the neocon-militarist network planning the war in Iraq and other hard-line policy initiatives that was based in the Pentagon and the vice president's office.<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC