Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP - Conservatives Urge Closer Look at Marriage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:29 PM
Original message
AP - Conservatives Urge Closer Look at Marriage

NEW YORK (AP) -- "Protection of marriage" is now the watchword for many activists fighting to prevent gays and lesbians from marrying. Some conservatives, however, say marriage in America began unraveling long before the latest gay-rights push and are pleading for a fresh, soul-searching look at the institution.
...
"When you talk about protecting marriage, you need to talk about divorce," said Bryce Christensen, a Southern Utah University professor who writes frequently about family issues.
...
"If those initiatives are part of a broader effort to reaffirm lifetime fidelity in marriage, they're worthwhile," he said. "If they're isolated - if we don't address cohabitation and casual divorce and deliberate childlessness - then I think they're futile and will be brushed aside."


Link:
http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=307082&category=&BCCode=&newsdate=11/21/2004

This is why gay rights matter to heterosexuals. The "deviant lifestyle choice" the right wing attacks may include YOU next time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'Deliberate childlessness' -- OMFG
Maybe this dude should mind his own fucking business
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. yep, that's what caught my eye....

Everyone needs to pop out a baby or two I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Good God, that one got me too......Not that there is not a litany to abhor
in his comments, but "deliberate childlessness?"

What are they going to do to the "intentional single..." Cast us on the waters as witches?

Have we always had so many nuts in this country (or are they just getting a wider voice now?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. They feel "empowered" now. But the nut cases have always been there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Geez, sex is only for procreation, right - so marriage -
-Marriage is only to have legal sex - in which to procreate, right?

How does one determine what is deliberate childlessness in a marriage? A couple may marry to "have children one day" and find out they can't - so do they just dissolve that marriage, no matter what they might have invested in that relationship? If someone's spouse leaves them after they get "fixed" or dies late in life, they can't re-marry, because there may not be any children from that second marriage?

feh. I think these opinions are from a "dude" who wants to cut out legal civil union status and economic benefits for couples who don't meet his strict relationship guideline.

But on the off chance this is totally based on a psuedo-Judeo-Christian basis, does he also privatly promotes all those good, old fashioned biblical penalties that go along with precieved sex/personal enjoyment crimes?
What next, Professor? Prison - errr, "re-education camps" for masturbators? Forced marriages contracted out by the father/male relative of the female?

(Shakes head) Does he really want to go there, or is he just blowing virtuous smoke for his fellow co-"religionists"?

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. I believe there are some deep-seated issues here
and they have nothing to do with social values or even religion, and everything to do with a seriously repressed upbringing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. What - they are going to outlaw contraception/sterilization now?
"The Handmaid's Tale" may be closer than we think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The empressof all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yup......
This sure is the right direction for Conservatives. Let's ban divorce, prosecute Adultry and banish childless couples.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. and only in the missionary position and everything else should be a
heinous felony. by by all you stupid fks that voted for this fruitcake. all the world art queer save thee and thow and even thow art a little queer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Yea' let's go back to the days when women where chattel
and women put up with hundreds of beatings over the course of a lifetime because they couldn't get out of a marriage. Yea' that's the ticket!

The problem is that I'm now hearing stuff we used to be sarcastic about earlier being seriously proposed by these loons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. They want to address "deliberate childlessness"?
Time to dust off The Handmaid's Tale, I guess. What a creepy bunch of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I urge a closer look at bigoted Conservative policy
I like Randi Rhodes' idea. Outlaw ALL marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Will that apply to Newt, Armey, Dole, and Giuliani, too?
You know, those Republicans who dump their wives for younger mistresses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wright Patman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. I take it
this doesn't apply to me since God made me incapable of bearing children.

If he means to apply this to males as well, it is a bit unfair as all reproductive decisions are currently in the hands of women--and I don't have a problem with that.

I do have a problem with being made to feel guilty about something over which I have no control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cabboll Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. ?
"address cohabitation" what the hell does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Outlaw "living together", of course.
Edited on Sun Nov-21-04 02:01 PM by mcscajun
We can't have anyone Fornicating in apartments and homes where the mailbox doesn't say "Mr. & Mrs. So-and-So" now, can we?

A conservative wingnut in Utah...gee...there's a surprise.

On Edit: with exceptions and apologies to our blue Utah compatriots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-22-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Hi cabboll!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. What are "family-friendly workplace policies"?
Are "family men" going to get more time off work than childless folk? Higher pay? Better insurance benefits?

Even now, I have collegues who get their first person coverage paid by contract, as well as full family coverage. Being childless and "unmarried" (don't tell my partner of 8 years), I get first person. Is that discrimination, or "family-friendly"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. bed checks to make sure you aren't cohabiting?
Your med plans won't cover contraception of any sort.

Preference in hiring "married with children" will become legal - potential employers can ask about family status and use it to base hiring decisions.

Think of every legal protection you have to keep your family business out of your employer's nose, and imagine they all vanish.

They will never GIVE more benefits to traditional families - they will only make life difficult for everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dand Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-21-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Out comes the brown shirts and the jack boots,
God is speaking directly to George the second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC