Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Deficit? What Deficit?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 01:13 AM
Original message
NYT: Deficit? What Deficit?
In The New York Times:

The White House serenely brushed off a detailed caution from the Congressional Budget Office last week that the growth in the deficit is more likely to roar than retreat across the next decade, fed by the three Bush tax cuts and other debt-fattening indulgences. If that warning was not enough, how about the concern reported at the International Monetary Fund that the administration has no credible plan to restore budget balance? Yes, the I.M.F., which must lecture the profligates of the globe, is worried that a structural deficit will push up interest rates and restrain growth as America ceaselessly borrows to steer red ink from imbalanced budgets onto future taxpayers.

The coming overview from the I.M.F. is reported to foresee that in the short run the United States will drive economic growth. But it can find no believable plan to rein in ballooning deficits, already at historic levels. The mix of detaxation and deficit spending that has overtaken the government under President Bush's guidance is rolling trillions of dollars in debt over to the uncertain future. The nonpartisan budget office's outlook is conservative compared with other responsible estimates of deficits averaging a half-trillion dollars across the decade, doubling the national debt to $9 trillion.

Hard choices should be made now about this grave threat, before the baby boomers are stuck with the bill in shrunken retirement benefits. But the dominant Republicans of Washington value no vision beyond pandering to taxpayers in the next election cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. thank you thank you thank you
What would we do without the NYT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. gimme a break
the NYT sucks big time
they have helped all of this along and now
they come in and whine about it
How many times has Friedman come in and promoted crap like NAFTA
and globalization? Countless.
Don't even get me started on Judith Miller.

The only thing good about the NYT is Krugman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyandproud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I can't believe this..
I started reading the NYT about six months ago, and nearly all of their cover stories cover something BAD happening in America...insinuating bush* is at fault, ad the editorials are something like 5-1 in our favor on most days, with the occasional puke fest thrown in to piss us off. I think the pro bush editorials all get posted here and most of the really good editorials that crush the pukes are taken for granted. Go to the bookstore this weekend...pick up a copy, and see for yourself!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I had a subscription to NYT
for years

I dropped it the day they came out defending bush on
911 pre-knowledge.

You need to understand how NYT operates.
They have a liberal facade but are nothing but
a mouthpiece for the elites that make up groups
like the Council on Foreign Relations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The NYTimes is one of the main reasons this country is in the
state it is in now. The whoring they have done for bush*, along with the other media whores, is the main reason bush* has been able to get away with all his lies about the economy, Iraq, Al-Qaeda, the environment, etc. They should have started calling bush* out on his lies from day one.

Only when they call for bush*'s impeachment will they get my support again.

Krugman is the only good thing about the Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swinney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-02-03 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. debt = interest paid=less for programs WHAT A FARCE--REAGAN NOW BUSH II
OUR DEBT WAS 917 bILLION WHEN REAGAN TOOK OFFICE IN JAN-1981.
He quickly took it to 2700 Billion. GW Bush took it to 4,000 Billion and Clinton to 5500 Billion.

Bush and Clinton had to absorb the high payment of interest on Reagan's debt.

Can anyone comprehend it took 200 years to get 917 B.

20 to get it to 5500.

Now 10 more years and double it???

30 years and disaster for our history.

Low interest rates and not too bad if we have boom economy.

No boom and hi interest rates spell disaster.

However--This is what is wanted by Grover Nutquist and right wing conservatives pushing Bush over the cliff.

They are sincere in wanting to destroy America. They want a skeleton nation.

They hate success. They hate America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC