NY Review of Books: Iraq, the Press and the Election

[TomClash]

In the end, the war in Iraq did not have the decisive impact on the election that many had expected. In the weeks before the vote there were the massacre of forty-nine Iraqi police trainees; a deadly attack inside the previously impenetrable Green Zone in Baghdad; the refusal by an army unit to carry out a supply mission on the grounds that it was too dangerous; the explosion of several car bombs at a ceremony where soldiers were handing out candy, killing dozens of children; the abduction of contractors, journalists, and aid workers, including the director of the CARE office in Baghdad; the release of a report holding the highest reaches of the Pentagon and the military responsible for the abuses at Abu Ghraib; a report by President Bush's hand-picked investigator confirming that Iraq had long ago lost its ability to produce weapons of mass destruction; and the spread of the insurgency to every corner of the country, bringing reconstruction to a virtual halt. All of this, in the end, counted for less to voters (if the exit polls are to be believed) than such issues as whether homosexuals should be allowed to marry and whether discarded embryos should be used for stem cell research.

How did this happen? In many ways, George Bush's victory seems to have confirmed the fact that large numbers of voters in America today are very conservative, dominated by strong attachments to God, country, and the traditional family. At the same time, it's not clear to what extent the public was aware of just how bad things had gotten in Iraq. For while there was much informative reporting on the war, a number of factors combined to shield Americans from its most brutal realities. A look at these factors can help to understand some neglected aspects of George Bush's victory.

<snip>

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17633

[BurtWorm]

1. That whole issue is worth reading.

Read the Powers and Hedges articles, too. And the one on Wal-Mart. And the one on Cary Grant.

[wurzel]

2. I don't believe these "exit polls". The question was totally slanted.

If I had been asked at the poll exit if I thought "Moral Values" were the most important thing I would say "yes". But that does not mean I voted for Bush. The war was the defining issue. To be "fair and balanced" it is almost impossible for the media, or the opposition, in this country to criticize the "commander in chief" at a time of war. That is why this war will go on as long as Bush is in office.