Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld's `shuck-and-jive'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Keirsey Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 09:10 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld's `shuck-and-jive'
Edited on Sun Dec-12-04 09:17 AM by Keirsey
We've probably seen the last unscripted, town hall-style meeting between Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and the troops who serve under him.

Faced with blunt questions from Iraq-bound soldiers at a base in Kuwait, Mr. Shock-and-Awe turned into Mr. Shuck-and-Jive.

He squinted. He squirmed. He hesitated. He dodged.

...

During the election campaign, John Kerry had made an issue of the armor and equipment shortages that were adding to U.S. casualties in Iraq. President Bush shrugged off the criticism, insisting that everything was hunky-dory.

That remains the sunny position of the White House, even as the situation in Iraq disintegrates toward a civil war.


http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/opinion/10388348.htm?1c


Another Rumfield editorial:

Troops heroic in confronting Rumsfeld

...

A staff sergeant from Fort Bragg, N.C., put on the table an issue that cries out for national debate – and, yes, national outrage. The “stop-loss” orders that force our men and women in uniform to stay in the service long after they have fulfilled the terms of their enlistments amount to a backdoor draft, no matter how you cut it. The sergeant certainly suggested that.

“My husband and myself, we both joined a volunteer Army,” said the sergeant, nicely inserting that word volunteer to make her point sharper. “Currently, I’m serving under the stop-loss program. I would like to know how much longer do you foresee the military using this program?”

Rumsfeld seemed to ask: What’s your beef? “The stop-loss has been used by the military for years and years and years,” he replied. “It’s all well understood when someone volunteers to join the service.” Which did not explain why the administration’s failure to anticipate just how tough this war would be is what’s forcing the military to rely so heavily on stop-loss to keep up our troop strength.


http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journalgazette/news/editorial/10400661.htm


edited to add E. J. Dionne's editorial

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well 'stuff happens'
Isn't that guy something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't happen in Vietnam era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC