Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AIM Report: How the Liberal Media Plan to Bring Down Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
illbill Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 01:58 PM
Original message
AIM Report: How the Liberal Media Plan to Bring Down Bush
This is garbage..... but here is what the other side believes:

http://www.realopinion.com/realboards/showthread.php?t=1028
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's a subversive idea: they could bring him down by telling the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Exactly. Even one tenth of the truth
hammered like the Peterson trial, could ruin the repugs for generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Yea, No shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. can't bring myself to read it
the very idea anyone thinks the media is LIBERAL and they are going to "take down" a glaringly incompetent "president" who DOESN'T EVEN QUALIFY FOR THE JOB and has been TRASHING AMERICA FOR FOUR YEARS, after he TRASHED TEXAS FOR SIX, is so, SO freaking absurd - why torment myself? Why bother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illbill Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It is depressing...
CNN has Conservative undertones, Fox is just ultimately Republican...

PBS is basically only one of the few respectable channels with news coverage (News Hour).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. CNN has pandered itself to capture FAUX's audience so that
they don't even seem to pretend anymore.

If it weren't for Olbermann and The Daily Show, DU would be (sadly and somewhat dangersously) the only place I got my news anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dontcha wish it were true ? ...
We could use a liberal media about now ....

Heck: We could have used them for decades : too bad they dont exist ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. I'd prefer one that strived for real objectivity.
The media was never liberal; apparently truth just favors liberalism and progressivism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Air America a luaghingstock & financial fiasco?
I count 41 affiliates, plus satellite radio and RECORD numbers of people streaming over the internet.

Why is Rush's consistent 2 share in all markets (propped up by sympathetic advertisers) a "success" when AAR has gone from 3 to 41 in only 9 months? I find AAR's success quite remarkable, actually...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think it was Al Gore who said...
about the repubicans, during his ill-fated first stolen election, "If you stop lying about the democrats, we'll stop telling the truth about you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It was Truman :-)
and we lost to Ike 4 years later

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh well...Al must have repeated it
I guess we shouldn't repeat it again, huh? *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. LOL - loved the "sigh" - It is a great line that has been true all my
life - Truman's line - not my "sigh" .... :-)

It should carved over the door of the new DNC building!

:toast:

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Actually it was Adlai Stevenson.
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/adlaieste107311.html

If the Republicans will stop telling lies about the Democrats, we will stop telling the truth about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've asked this before and I'll ask it again?
If the wingers really believe there's a liberal media bias, why don't they get the fairness doctorine reinstated?:think: They have the power to do it. Anyone? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
27. Thanks for asking again; I'd never thought of like that.
'cept now I'm wondering if we should be careful what we wish for.

You want Colon Bowel Jr. determinine what's fair and balanced on the air? If Fox News is what the government determines as the gold standard for objectivity in reporting, we're all well and truly Cheneyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. WHAT Liberal Media?
Seems to me liberals can't get airtime, or get it too late, or only get in it fiercely conservative venues where they mostly serve as punching bags.

Except for Air America, a station they had to buy outright in order to get a word in edgewise,

There is no liberal media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
s-cubed Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. THINK DUerrs: I haven't read yet but does this give you any ideas?
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 03:27 PM by scubed
This is the first step in a process: they always start whining like this about the "liberal" when they know they're gonna get hit.
So, what are they expecting to get hit with & are there any ideas that we ought to use?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is a scream!
No, really, funny shit in there.

Fox News is a response to the overwhelming liberal media bias.

That bias, said Evan Thomas of Newsweek, was worth between five and 20 million votes for the Kerry-Edwards ticket.


ooookay. IOW, if we had a "fair and balanced" media, then we can predict with scientifical ackracy that Kerry would've only drawn,oh, between 37 and 52 million voters.

then there's

Mayer also disclosed that a secret meeting of anti-Bush billionaires was held in August, after the Democratic Party convention, and that Soros was a key participant.

But we didn't see any stories in the media about the "billionaire conspiracy" against the President.


...the FUCK? you couldn't swing a cat in the summer of 2004 without some wingnut whining about Soros!

I could go on, but I have a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. But does he mention the 'not so secret' meetings every Wednesday
between Norquist and all THOSE BILLIONAIRES? No? Wonder why...it's that damn liberal media again! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. Also, many RW "pundits" are included.
It's a big, smelly machine, and it must be stopped for the good of the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. No surprise - facts are omitted in the statements
I had to stop reading about half way through.... but this just made me roll my eyes...

-snip-
In Ohio, where the anti-homosexual measure passed with 62 percent of the vote, 16 newspapers opposed it, including the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Toledo Blade, The Cincinnati Enquirer and The Columbus Dispatch.

btw - so did both of our REPUBLICAN senators and our REPUBLICAN governor. It was a BS bill put on the ballot in a stealth kinda way to bring out the church vote.

Just goes to show - they know the Shrub is corrupt and could have a case against him that makes Watergate look like a ticket for a wide right turn and they are preparing their followers for the scapegoat of the liberal press.

Ugh - the brainwashing..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. Ha ha. What a pathetic Straw Man. There is no Liberal Media
Edited on Tue Jan-04-05 11:28 PM by tom_paine
if there is one it is dwarfed in size by the Bushevik Propaganda Edifice, and it is forced to still try and obey some rules, while the Busheviks can self-reinforce any damned lie they please or shout down the truth.

Like Hulk Hogan whining about how Gilligan is planning to whip his ass.

Or more accurately, the Nazis using their battered Jewish population as Scare Tactic, when in fact in Germany and most everywhere else the Jews had no power at all.

It is disgusting and frightening and enraging, watching it all happen again.

We are one LIHOP or an economic calamity away from the abyss of Totalitarian Darkness (albeit Kinder and Genlter and without boxcars of piteous victims, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. If only it were true
or even possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. My first reaction, but upon refleciton, I don't want a "liberal media"
Edited on Wed Jan-05-05 08:27 AM by bunkerbuster1
I just want one that holds everyone's feet to the fire. Problem is, they don't.

Hell, listening to NPR this morning, there was yet another goddamned Bush-licking story about SS "reform." After presenting the reThug plan in terms that conveniently avoided mention of the trillion or so it'll cost to finance these mothercheneying private accounts, they had a guy on from DC's Urban Institute...

and I suppose he was supposed to be the "balance," but crap--he was describing this theft in the blandest, most namby-pampy manner imaginable. And of course good ol' Maura gave him slow-pitch softball followups, asking toughies like (paraphrasing) "If we were going to start SS from scratch, how many years of benefits would the typical recipient expect to see?"

Hardly an upgrade from the rest of the Rove steno pool.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Exactly. One of the biggest problems with the media now is
that they are are big-time LAZY.

They let press releases function as news with nary a check into accuracy.

"The Republican Noise Machine" really opened my eyes. I knew it was happening, I just didn't know how it happened so easily.

We need to get a truly free press back before we can really hope ot accomplish anything as progressives/liberals. Not a LIBERAL press, a free, objective one. The truth just favors our side, it isn't part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-05-05 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
26. "Kellyanne Conway of The Polling Company "
obviously fails to note Kellyanne and her attorney husband are rabid RWer's....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC