Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Social Security: How Bush Plans to Ruin Another American Institution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 09:46 PM
Original message
Social Security: How Bush Plans to Ruin Another American Institution
It's not enough that the President has you terrified over terror and sent thousands to die in Iraq. He's clipped the wings on Medicare, and now he wants to do the same to Social Security.
By Matt Hutaff Jan 12, 2005

<snip> The President is gearing up to spend between $50-100 million to convince susceptible Americans that the sky is indeed falling, and that if Social Security isn't changed to suit his whims the economy is hosed. <snip>

Its administrative costs are less than one percent of the overall amount of money the trust maintains every year, and depending on who you talk to, Social Security can stay in the black for another half-century. <snip>

This is an administration that has botched Medicare to the tune of $6 trillion by seeking to rework its benefits packages (over 300,000 men and women were dropped from expanded Medicaid programs this month in Tennessee alone thanks to budget shortfalls created by Bush) and has eliminated the possibility of allowing the importation of cheap prescription medication from Canada. They are incapable of thinking of responsible financial measures that would help resolves the growing economical crisis here. <snip>

http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0721_social_security_how_bush_plans_ruin_another_american_institution.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. The American people are getting the government they asked for
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Only about 30% of Americans asked for this government. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Everyone who was qualified to register and did not vote for Kerry ratified
every known Administration policy and action and every planned policy and action IMHO. That's 70%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Cursing the general population is a cop-out. Yeah, we should ...
... have been able to stroll to a takeover of Congress and the White House -- but what do we learn from the fact that we lost? Let's stop wasting our time cussing about American stupidity, and let's get back into the full-time fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Has not the general population copped-out following the cop-out
of the Congress, the Supreme Court and the mainstream media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The general population is constantly subjected to a barrage ...
... of corporate messages designed to produce anxiety and to encourage consumerism as the antidote to that anxiety.

This mass-produced consciousness furthers specific socio-political ends: however, it is not intended to empower people, and it particular it is not designed to improve folks' ability to deconstruct propaganda.

The question "How can we best confront this reality, in order to change it?" is a scientific question, and answering this question will continue to require hard intellectual work on our part, combined with genuine experimentation, and a willingness to engage in our own efforts to mass-produce psychological tools that will enable people to study, understand, and modify realities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. "The Madness of George W. Bush: A Reflection of our Collective Psychosis"
provides further food for thought. See http://baltimorechronicle.com/011305PaulLevy.shtml

"Bush's sickness is our own."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I have two reactions to this:
(1) At an emotional level, I find myself pretty much in agreement with the author, that the current crisis involves some derangements of thought.

But (2) I don't consider the article useful from a scientific point of view. The article does not really provide any analytic tools that would empower its readers to act effectively against the regime. Nor is it likely to influence anyone who does not already agree with its thesis that Mad King George was elected by a nation of nutcases.

No doubt many Americans have views I find too bizarre to understand; some are downright flaky; a few are criminally insane. And none of this really explains *'s rise to power, nor does it suggest how best to resist. Whether or not * is simply out of his mind, the turkle did not climb up on that there post all by hisself. Behind * is an army of professional manipulators, whose salaries are paid by particular interests. These interests exist independent of *: if * did not exist, these same interests would have found another frontman to play the same role. As we attempt to understand reality in ever greater detail, we must be able to name those interests, to understand their actual (often conflicting motivations), to recognize and track their political mercenaries, and to be prepared to expose their manipulative psychological tricks. Of course these tricks derange people's thinking: the tricks are intended to do just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-15-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And they have done it very well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Resistence is not futile.
<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-14-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Spending 50-100 million of taxpayer funds.
Chimpy is trying to convince the soft Dems that this is right for the country. I'M thirty-six and have always said it wouldn't be around when I was sixty-five. I sure never thought SS would go away like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC