Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Politics, not need, drives Social Security 'reform'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 10:18 PM
Original message
Politics, not need, drives Social Security 'reform'
By Palm Beach Post Editorial
Tuesday, January 11, 2005

<snip> Behind this campaign is an attempt not to adjust a program facing demographic change but to undermine the very concept of Social Security, which will turn 70 this year and continues to accomplish its mission. President Bush and other ideologues who want to eliminate those parts of government they don't like — and don't need personally — would substitute risk for certainty, penalize future retirees and further jeopardize the nation's finances, for the political glee of burying a New Deal triumph.

Last week, The Associated Press broke the story of a White House e-mail from Karl Rove's sidekick. It stressed the need to make Americans believe that Social Security is "heading for an iceberg." That explains why the administration is ignoring the usual 75-year financial forecasts for Social Security and warning of a mystical $11 trillion gap between revenue and benefits projected into infinity. That explains why the administration probably will propose cutting future Social Security payments by linking them to prices, which rise slower than wages. The White House wants to create in the public mind a scenario that only some form of private retirement accounts can address. <snip>

The need to adjust Social Security, based on the shrinking number of working and rising numbers of retirees, is real. The need to radically privatize is fiction. Behind the White House push are those who would profit from the change. Securities firms would get new business. Large employers would escape any increase in the payroll tax that finances Social Security; employers match employees' 6.2 percent contribution. Think back to Medicare "reform," which came with large subsidies for the insurance, health-care and pharmaceutical industries and only promises of help for most beneficiaries.

The Bush administration was not honest about Iraq, and the country got a debacle. The Bush administration was not honest about Medicare, and the country got a larger bill, not reform. The Bush administration is not being honest about Social Security. How long will it take before the country finally gets it?

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/opinion/content/opinion/epaper/2005/01/11/a12a_socsecedit_0111.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasBushwhacker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent editorial - lays it all out - N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC