Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Subverting the press with propaganda on the rise (Shaw / LAT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:51 PM
Original message
Subverting the press with propaganda on the rise (Shaw / LAT)
<snip> But as appalled as I am by Bush's willful misreading of history, I'm even more upset by his hypocrisy. He seems determined to destroy the very foundations of American democracy that he insists are our bulwark against our enemies and the cause of our enemies' hatred of us. He launched a preemptive war against Iraq by lying to the American public. He helped create an atmosphere in which the torture of enemy prisoners in violation of the Geneva accords was tolerated, if not encouraged. And his administration has consistently tried to subvert our free press by masking government propaganda as legitimate news and opinion. <snip>

Shortly after 9/11, reports began to circulate that the administration's Office of Strategic Influence was planning to plant false news stories in the international media. In 2002, amid much controversy, the office was shut down. But as my Times colleague Mark Mazzetti subsequently reported, "much of OSI's mission — using information as a tool of war — has been assumed by other offices throughout the U.S. government." <snip>

Early last year, several news stations around the country broadcast a story on plans for a White House advertising campaign on the dangers of drug abuse. But the "journalist" who reported this story was not a journalist, and his report was actually produced by the Bush administration. <snip>

But few administrations have actually tried to subvert the news media and use taxpayer dollars to mislead the American public as blatantly as has the Bush administration. When you combine those efforts with Bush's record of media avoidance — he had fewer news conferences in his first term than any first-term president since William Howard Taft — it becomes clear that for all his speechifying about American freedoms, he has no interest in the unfettered operation of a free press properly serving a free society.

http://www.latimes.com/features/lifestyle/cl-ca-shaw16jan16,0,7554071.column?coll=la-home-utilities





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Major kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Honestly, I think he has no interest at all in having a free society
here, or anywhere else!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing seems to stick
Great column. There has been others. The general public is comatose and self absorbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. and we used to think Reagen was the Teflon President!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Raygun's "teflon" was manufactured by the same ReichsPravda Machine
Call it "intial feasability studies" on the New and Improved "Goebbels v2.0".

While I suspect it had some to do with Raygun the man, in retrospect the PARTY was gearing up for a situation where the PERSON didn't matter, where no matter what odious fraud they put forth, he would be hailed as the Kidn and Noble and Godly Fuhrer.

we have lived to see the fruition of those goals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Of course if there was an OPPOSITION party to
call Bush on his lies he would be forced to back down. With the Dems supporting many of his policies and unwilling to challenge him in the name of 9/11 he is allowed to get by with his excesses.

Imagine how the pugs would have reacted had the Clinton administration PAID a commentator to shill for Americorps or something similar. They would STILL be complaining about it and it would be a talking point on the right-wing talk shows to this day.

The Dems remain supine in the presence of government excess. Then they wonder why so many stay home on "election" day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-17-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. hope more stories like this continue to be written!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC