Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your Inaugural Address was MAGNIFICENT, mein fuhrer!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:19 PM
Original message
Your Inaugural Address was MAGNIFICENT, mein fuhrer!!!
Can we plump your pillow (since we're here in bed with you with the covers all the way up)?

This just in from the RNC. The Committee's buddies in the MSM phoned in maximum praise for *'s inaugural address yesterday. "*'s lofty ideals were exceeded only by their eloquence, blah, blah, blah... " The adulation shown in these editorials for *'s words has been duly noted on the RNC website, and the RNC checks for services rendered are in the mail (figuratively speaking).

http://www.gop.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=5085

Friday, January 21, 2005
What They're Saying: President Bush's Inaugural Address

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Editorials And Op-Eds:

The Wall Street Journal: “Not Since JFK In 1960 Has An American President Provided Such An Ambitious And Unabashed Case For The Promotion Of Liberty At Home And Abroad.” (Editorial, “Liberty Bell Ringer,” The Wall Street Journal, 1/21/05)

David Broder, The Washington Post: Called The Speech, “Brief But Eloquent…” (David S. Broder, Op-Ed, “Big Goals, Unshakable Faith,” The Washington Post, 1/21/05)

Broder: “ne Essential Truth We Have Learned About Bush: His Faith That The Quest For Freedom Is A Universal Truth, Rooted In Human Nature And Intended By God.” (David S. Broder, Op-Ed, “Big Goals, Unshakable Faith,” The Washington Post, 1/21/05)
William Safire, The New York Times: “I Rate It Among The Top 5 Of The 20 Second-Inaugurals In Our History. Lincoln's Profound Sermon ‘With Malice Toward None’ Is Incomparable, But Bush's Second Was Better Than Jefferson's Mean-Spirited Pouting At ‘The Artillery Of The Press.’” (William Safire, Op-Ed, “Bush's ‘Freedom Speech,’” The New York Times, 1/21/05)

USA Today: “When George W. Bush Was Inaugurated For The First Time Four Years Ago, He Devoted Only Seven Sentences To Foreign Policy. Thursday, A More Seasoned And Confident Bush Delivered A Stirring Inaugural Call To The Longstanding American Ideal Of Spreading Freedom And Democracy Around The Globe.” (Editorial, “Bush Shares A Stirring Vision. Now, How To Apply It?” USA Today, 1/21/05)

Los Angeles Times: “His Second Inaugural Address Was That Of A Large Man Indeed, Eloquently Weaving The Big Themes Of His Presidency And His Life Into A Coherent Philosophy And A Bold Vision Of How He Wants This Country To Spend The Next Four Years.” (Editorial, “No Country Left Behind,” Los Angeles Times, 1/21/05)

New York Post: “President Bush Stood Tall Before America And The World Yesterday And Marked The Beginning Of His Second Term With An Affirmation Of Liberty That Will Resonate For Years To Come.” (Editorial, “Bush's 2nd Inaugural,” New York Post, 1/21/05)

John Harris, The Washington Post: “he 21-Minute Address He Delivered At The Capitol Yesterday Was Startling In Its Reach.” (John F. Harris, Op-Ed, “An Ambitious President Advances His Idealism,” The Washington Post, 1/21/05)

Harris: “His Pledges To Promote Liberty And Aid The Oppressed, Along With Predictions Of The United States Leading The World To The Ultimate Triumph Of Democracy Over Tyranny In Every Land, Were Issued With Some Of The Most Expansive And Lyrical Language Bush Has Summoned.” (John F. Harris, Op-Ed, “An Ambitious President Advances His Idealism,” The Washington Post, 1/21/05)

Dallas Morning News: “The President, Exuding Both Gravity And Confidence, Was Indisputably Presidential. His Speech Embodied Everything That Makes Him The Leader He Is: Unembarrassed Religious Faith, Moral Certitude, Persistence, Determination And Self-Assuredness.” (Editorial, “Values-Laden Vision: Bush Shines As He Delivers Second-Term Ideals,” The Dallas Morning News, 1/21/05)

St. Louis Post-Dispatch: “President George W. Bush Delivered An Eloquent, Idealistic Second Inaugural On Thursday That Was An Ode To America’s Special Role In Promoting Freedom Around The World.” (Editorial, “Bush’s Second Inaugural: Ode To Freedom,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 1/21/05)

The Plain Dealer: “In A Scant 21 Minutes, Bush Delivered What May Have Been The Speech Of His Presidency, A Thematic Symphony Keyed To The Unalienable Rights Of People - The Same Truths This Nation’s Founders Held To Be Self-Evident.” (Editorial, “Bush’s Call To Freedom,” The Plain Dealer, 1/21/05)

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: “George W. Bush’s Second Inaugural Address, Given In A Time Of War And Doubt, Was An Inspiring Call For Selflessness And Sacrifice. It Was A Call For Americans To Advance The Cause Of Freedom From Tyranny Worldwide.” (Editorial, “A New Bush Doctrine?” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 1/21/05)

Pundits:

NBC’s Tim Russert: “Well-Crafted, Well-Delivered. The Themes Of Freedom And Liberty … I Thought The Call To National Service Will Resonate With All Americans – Democrats, Republicans, Independents.” (NBC’s, “Special Coverage Of The 55th Inaugural,” 1/20/05)

CBS News’ Bob Schieffer Said Speech Was “Eloquent And The Rhetoric Lofty.” (CBS’ “Evening News With Dan Rather,” 1/20/05)

ABC News’ George Will: “It’s Not Just The Survival Of Liberty He’s About. He Is About The Expansion Of Liberty Into Every Nook And Crevasse Of The Planet.” (ABC’s “Inaugural Coverage,” 1/20/05)

Howard Fineman, Newsweek: Called The Address “Powerful. I Think It Is The Biggest Statement Of American Purpose In The World Of Any President I Can Think Of. It Is Woodrow Wilson On Steroids. It’s Big.” (MSNBC’s “Hardball,” 1/20/05)

Dick Morris, Former Aide To President Clinton: “Was The Greatest … Since John F. Kennedy’s And One Of The Five Or Sixth Greatest Of All Time. It Was Beautiful, It Was Poetic. … And It Articulated A Bold New Doctrine For American Policy. It Was A Very Substantive Speech.” (Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor,” 1/20/05)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. this deserves a
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Absolutely....let me just add one more.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. hey, I like your avatar
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 06:02 PM by musette_sf
A familiar view. I went back home in 2002, and cried on the N* train over the bridge. Also cried while looking out on the harbor from the Belt near the old 69th St Pier. Then I went to the just-reopened Winter Garden and cried some more.

Oh. yeah, more about those editorial^^^stenographic comments --
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

*it might have been the B, too, can't remember if I was going to my mom's or my sister's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That's the Brooklyn Bridge in the foreground with the WTC towers behind it
Guess you would have seen it from the N train while going over the Manhattan Bridge.
I can see the Verrazano Bridge from the room where I am typing on my 'puter..here in Brooklyn...and used to be able to see the WTC as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I know exactly where the pic is
I think I know where you are too!
I used to live on Ridge Blvd & 89th, Mom still lives there.

Like I read after 9/11/01, some people thought they were ugly buildings, but dammit, they were OUR ugly buildings, and if we wanted to get rid of them it should have been up to us! And now that I have to look at the ghostly image of the (ahem) Freedom Tower in the "artist's rendition" of the future skyline, I have decided that there *can* be an uglier building. No offense to anyone who likes it, but I think it's hideous. It doesn't replace anything, just calls attention to the wound worse than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. What would've been the perfect project ?
I know the real estate value for the area is so high but I thought from the start that the perfect plan would've been to make the whole site into a memorial park. Lord knows downtown Manhattan could use the green space and living things ie: trees, grass, etc would in my opinion be a fitting memorial rather than just another steel and glass office tower.


"But what I do believe in is keeping promises to the people," she said. "I told them election night - and I didn't know how prophetic this was - that if I had to stand alone, I will do it. I am not afraid." - Barbara Boxer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I say build 'em again
Edited on Sun Jan-23-05 02:31 PM by musette_sf
big as life and twice as ugly.

All the "Freedom" Tower symbolizes to me is loss, the missing, the hole in the sky, it's like a giant finger pointing to them all.

Build' em again, reaffirm the architect's dream and design, and let NYC and the world watch. It will never happen, but from my way of thinking, it was so healing (though painful) to go back to the Winter Garden after it was reconstructed... why *not* put them back?

(putting flame suit on) I do understand the need of many of the surviving family members for a memorial, for nothing to stand on that spot. I also understand that for many of them, their faith requires a burial. But in reality, how many other graves of centuries past sit underneath where we walk and work? I believe the best use would be to build them again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. No flames from me
I thought that too - rebuild them - after they showed the designs for the new building(s). I didn't like any of them frankly. The park idea is of course a pipe dream. We all know that nobody is going to waste all that "good land" on a park. I meant a real park with a memorial in it not a memorial that took up the whole space. If you walk lower Manhattan you're no doubt walking over many unknown gravesites. It actually would be interesting to have the Towers back everyday I take the train over the Williamsburg Bridge and glance in that direction reminds me of the loss. But "Freedom Tower" it'll be and the funny thing is that after a time we'll probably think the same of it as we did the Towers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Heil Hitler!!!
:grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr::grr:

How the HELL can all of the media see his speech as being so "wonderful" and compare it with JFK??? :wtf:

JFK was ANTI-WAR, Bush is a War Loving POS!!!

:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Check out freedom_to_read's
Edited on Fri Jan-21-05 05:25 PM by TexasLawyer
Annotated speech. It's brilliant. I just kicked it a few minutes ago.

Here's the link, in case we get separated.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x99460
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Slurrrrpppp!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
infusionman Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Go Stillers!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ok...are these people insane???
I expected mayhem today and in the coming days!!!!!!

Bush's speech was horrific, sickening and so completely outer limits!

How can the media really like what the Fascist Cowboy said?

I'm....well...stunned.

And what in the heck is wrong with Dick Morris?

What planet are we on again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Cause they're bought and paid for.
I don't think so many otherwise intelligent people would fawn over that POS speech or praise every other statement or proposal that Shrub makes if they or their media co. employer weren't somehow beholden to the RNC and its satellite organizations, either directly or indirectly. Speeches to the Heritage foundation, book deals with Regnery Press, think-tank "fellowships," jobs for spouses and children at think-tanks, continued access to administration personnel and the like.

On another thread, I posted some reactions from the foreign press to the * inaugural address. It's refreshing to see editorials written by people whose opinions are not tainted by conflicts of interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FizzFuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. link please? I'd love to see foreign press reactions.
Much more honest and intelligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Here's the link to my other thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FizzFuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am stunned by the starry eyed butt-hole-surfing gushing forth from these
Edited on Sat Jan-22-05 06:01 PM by FizzFuzz
so called assessors of current events and the political system.

And how did these putative experts suddenly all become naive ingenues, attributing such a level of powerful oratory to Mr. Boom-Boom Sniff-N-Chug?

You'd think they actually believed professional speechwriters and public speaking coaches DIDN'T spend the last month working with smirky (in between his vacations and "distractions") to make him sound coherent.

You'd think yards and yards of gold lame wrapped substanceless rhetoric were actually impressive and meaningful in some way.

You'd think it wasn't full of PNAC weasel words that mean the opposite of what they sound like.

There's a real danger in buzz words. They stop people from thinking....."Freedom" every 1.5 minutes in a 28 minute speech; another word for it is BRAINWASHING.


:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. LOL-->"Mr. Boom-Boom Sniff-N-Chug?"
Fizz, ya got it spot on. They say it enough times to dull witted souls and it becomes true somehow but it's really:

THE BRAINWASHING OF AMERICA

*see my sig line..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. "thank goodness..I am a son of a bush...."
"I keep using people and they keep luving me..thank goodness I am a son of a bush.."


"to thine own self be true"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. It's almost as if "greatest speech since JFK's" were a rightwing talking
point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. The only things missing were the torchlights!
Mark my words, the Nazi Party has already rounded up Muslims, now it is only a matter of time before Gays and Lesbians are rounded up and sent to ¢hri$tian re-education camps!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. German commentator likened coverage of the speach...
to the "Leni Riefenstahl-izement" of American politics. I think I found the comment on the website for Die Zeit...not sure there is an English translation. This was an man who had immigrated to the US in the 30's and has taught at a university. He thinks the whole mess looks too much like the Germany he left as a young person.

Ah, the things one learns when one is bilingual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. I feel like a nice big cup of kool-aid right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. WTF is wrong with people?!
David Broder, The Washington Post: Called The Speech, “Brief But Eloquent…” (David S. Broder, Op-Ed, “Big Goals, Unshakable Faith,” The Washington Post, 1/21/05)


How can he call the speech eloquent when half of it was the words 'liberty' and 'freedom'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon2 Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. How can these commentators speak
with their tongues so far up Bush's fadoodle? I couldn't bear to watch Nuremberg Rally - the Sequel on live tv. But if threatened with death or torture, I'll be sure to pick it up when it comes out on DVD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC