Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3rd World Threat of Nuclear Weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 08:08 PM
Original message
3rd World Threat of Nuclear Weapons
My wife mentioned something about some fellow in Iraq having been found with a computer that held plans, or the beginning of plans, or whatever it was, of a nuclear weapon for Allah. This apparently constitutes a nuclear weapons program.

I thought about that for a moment and I thought about the capabilty of our space-based surveillance systmes. And then this occured to me. When we got ourselves into the nuclear weapons business we had to build Oak Ridge, Hanford, the Nevada Test Site, and Los Alamos. We're talking about the employee of 60,000 people, real estate to the tune of maybe 1,500 square miles if memory serves me. This little endeavor cost us roughly 10% of the country's power production (electricity) for the years the bomb was being built too, in case you didn't know it.

So tell me, has technology improved to the extent that one guy in Iraq with a computer can be as productive as our entire Manhattan Project was? Could this possibly have in any way have been a threat to us? And even as inadequate as our intelligence was, as we are told (I'm not sure there is a single thing wrong with our intelligence), you would have to think that if a credible threat was emerging someone would have noticed. After all, would they not at the very least have to built a complex to rival the one we needed for our first three bombs?

Thom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not at all
Edited on Fri Jan-09-04 08:19 PM by Rick Myers
All you'd need is a decent machine shop, a small lab and a safe place to store stolen fissile material. The plan for the Little Boy-type bomb could be built in a well-equipped home machine shop! It's the least effective design, but it's still a Bomb. The hardest part would be getting the radioactive materials needed.

Now, these bombs would be big and cumbersome, but they would work.

Fat Man type bombs and reducing the size so that they could be delivered by missile or airplane require a whole lot of further effort.

on edit:

Little Boy was a 'cannon' design, slamming two pieces of material together to get a reaction. Fat Man was a spherical 'compression' device requiring precise design and timing electronics.

Making anything 'deliverable' is the hardest part. But a device that could fit into a shipping container is possible without too much research and development. Of course, handling radioactive materials is NOT as simple as handling eggs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Correct....
there is NO need to build a Los Alamos type facility for nuclear
weapons' construction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC