Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So they finally found WMDs in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:20 PM
Original message
So they finally found WMDs in Iraq
Edited on Sun Jan-11-04 09:05 PM by Bucky
Close, but no cigar. They've been buried for 10+ years, were to be used in the war against Iran (or the Kurds Poppy hung out to dry in '88) and they came from...?

Well, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3386357.stm">the BBC story doesn't speculate on their source. But I've got a pretty good guess as to who might have given Iraq those bombs.


Suspect shells examined in Iraq
Coalition experts are examining dozens of mortar shells found in southern Iraq which could contain chemical weapons

...Danish troops who found them said they showed traces of blister gases - compounds which include mustard gas. However, US officials played down the find, saying the shells were probably left over from Saddam Hussein's 1980-88 war with Iran.

The coalition has yet to uncover proof that Iraq was still developing weapons at the time of the war last spring. The 36 120mm shells appear to have been buried for at least 10 years, the Danes said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Reason they "played down the find"
Is probably because they have USA stamped on them. If they didn't, Bush* would be all over this claiming that these are the WMDs he knew Saddam had all along, the same way he did for other much less spectacular things, like that "mobile weapons lab" truck that made hydrogen for weather balloons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. a big, hot AMEN, bro to that one!
bin GOH!

what else could be the reason they aren't spreading that all over the place, especially in the face of the ONeill revelations?

nothing else makes sense, does it?

they've used the tiniest snips of garbage to advance their point, ALL of which have come up empty.

now, with tangible evidence of LOTS of ordnance, they don't talk about it at ALL?

what gives?

this makes no sense at all, other than the possibility that it's identifiable as OURS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. The WMD
are in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. How long is mustard gas good for?
Does it degrade into something inert, or does it maintain its strength and viability for a long time, I wonder? (Not that it matters.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That mustard was intended for hot dogs
Kurdish hot dogs. The ones we didn't give a damn about in 1988 but were willing to avenge 15 years later when it turned out that, um, Iraq was about to start paying its oil-for-debts in Euros instead of dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
governmentgoodies Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The expiration date...
:shrug:

is probably something on the order of actual Mustard. Probably about 2 years. Which is about the same time that hot dogs usually take to pass through my system which is why I usually don't eat them.
Peanut Butter lasts a bit longer so maybe that gas is next on the list.

Alarming, no?

gg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Welcome to DU!!!
:party: :bounce: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
governmentgoodies Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Thanks HypnoToad.
:bounce:

Happy to be here!

gg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Very long shelf life on that stuff. There have been French
farmers in modern times that have been killed when they plowed up a pocket of mustard gas still there from WWI. Sorry, no link. Just remembering a newspaper story from some years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solinvictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Chemical Weapons
Much like the Chinese who dug up Japanese artillery shells from the Manchurian occupation. That stuff is lethal for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. doesn't matter what the shelf life is.....you need LOTS and LOTS
With regard to biological weapons, the assessment by Professor Anthony H. Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies should be taken seriously: "The shelf-life and lethality of Iraq's weapons is unknown, but it seems likely that the shelf-life was limited. In balance, it seems probable that any agents Iraq retained after the Gulf War now have very limited lethality, if any" (Iraq's Past and Future Biological Weapons Capabilities, 1998, p.13).

There are two potential exceptions for materials that would not be expected to have deteriorated if produced before 1991. Mustard gas has been found to persist over time, as shown when Unscom discovered four intact mustard-filled artillery shells that would still have constituted a viable weapon. Unscom oversaw the destruction of 12,747 of Iraq's 13,500 mustard shells. The Iraqi regime claimed that the remaining shells had been destroyed by US/UK bombardment. This claim has not been verified or disproved. However, as former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter notes, "A few hundred 155 mm mustard shells have little military value on the modern battlefield. A meaningful CW attack using artillery requires thousands of rounds. Retention of such a limited number of shells makes no sense and cannot be viewed as a serious threat."

The other potential exception is VX nerve agent. It became clear to Unscom during the 1990s that Iraq had succeeded before 1991 in producing stabilised VX in its laboratories - that is, VX agents that would not deteriorate over time. However, to produce significant stocks of VX requires advanced technology that Iraq did not have. Iraq did have some elements of the production equipment for developing VX on a large scale. Unscom tested this equipment before destroying it in 1996, and found that it had never been used. This would indicate that Iraq, despite its attempts before 1991, had never succeeded in producing VX on a significant scale.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rattlesnake Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. So they found old, useless mustard gas, eh?
Edited on Sun Jan-11-04 10:15 PM by Rattlesnake
That's all they're going to find. There's no other WMDs in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. If there were, Saddam would have used them to keep from being captured
...or he would have used them on the troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. yeah, I read the Danes(?) found something. The Danes???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fabius Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. Now that's a modern weapon...
If I'm not mistaken a 120 mm mortar has a range of about 5000 KM. Really a big threat to the US. Not to mention being pretty rusty and unlikely to be usable.

Same stuff they shot at my grandfather back in the "Great War".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coldgothicwoman Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. Also, the immediate effects of Mustard Gas
are nil. The MSDS sheets on Mustard Gas specifically state this. Also, Atrios has a picture of the 'find' on his site. Laughable, to say the very least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Very scary (if you're easily frightened by corrosion)...

It's hard to make out the "USA" stenciled on the side, though... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. The story has dropped from sight...
My guess is that the shells they found were American-made. The good thing about this is that the Danish troops found them, so there's a good chance we'll find out the true origin of the missiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC