Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 10:58 AM
Original message |
|
This is bad, since I tend to believe what Thom says. On Friday he opined that Wes Clark is the candidate of the Clinton's choosing, BECAUSE HE CAN'T WIN, AND THEREFORE WON'T IMPEDED HILLARY'S BID FOR THE NOMINATION IN 2008. I find this one hard to believe. B&H are very partisan, and wouldn't sabotage this election cycle, would they?
|
KissMyAsscroft
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Thats rightwing spin... |
FDRrocks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Thom missed on that one. |
|
Clark stands a better chance than his boy, IMO.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |