Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why should we believe O'Neill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:01 PM
Original message
Why should we believe O'Neill?
Don't get me wrong -- personally, I *do* believe him, and I'm certain that at least some members of the Bush administration have been wanting to attack Iraq for a long time.

But just to play devil's advocate: what convincing arguments are there that O'Neill isn't just a former employee with a grudge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. 19,000 documents should probably clear that question up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a_random_joel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Apparently
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 03:03 PM by a_random_joel
There are 19,000+ documents that back him up. (Smart guy)

Ron Suskind is a former WSJ reporter who has some credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. we had have multiple accounts of the way policy is set
from people on the inside . That and the 19,000 pages
of documents .

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
braunbuddy Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. 1-hour News Special
Does anyone know of a 1-hour news special regarding O'Neill's book to be aired this week??? I saw something on the TV yesterday but can't remember whether it was NBC, CBS et al.....

Please help!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. It was 60 minutes yesterday CBS here's the transcript
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
braunbuddy Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Actually I saw something in addition to this 60 Min.
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 04:41 PM by braunbuddy
Thanks. I watched the 60 Minutes program but this was a specific 1-hour segment and I think it was NBC or MSNBC but could be any of the networks (ABC, CNN, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I wonder if you are thinking of Kevin Phillips' book
He had a hour show on c-span this week..with all these insider
books coming out , I'm getting the names muddled a bit .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Hi braunbuddy!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Axis of Evil was written into the GOP platform
by a PNAC member named Bruce Jackson, right about the time John McCain was wiping the floor with The Chimp in the 2000 Republican primaries. It's been an issue out in the open well before The Chimp even knew Iraq was a country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. His Charges Don't Come in a Vacuum
They're corroborated by many, many others...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. O'neil is a very rich man
why expose yourself to the scrutiny and possible danger? I'd guess that he wants to clear his conscience. An honest man possibly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrickS Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. As opposed to Bush, Cheney & all?
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 03:09 PM by PatrickS
Come on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. He served two previous Republican administrations.
He served two previous Republican administrations. And served them well enough that the Bush II administration picked him again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. He got fired because he was telling the truth
bush does not want honest people around him; he wants people who can keep a secret. People in the WH do not know what the truth is today because of all the lies told; therefore the need for secrecy. They forgot that axiom of Mark Twain, "always tell the truth and you'll never have to remember anything." O'Neill isn't holding a grudge. Condi may one day hold a grudge for sticking by the side of the monster, which effectively, has ruined her life after bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monobrau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. What does that mean?
"former employee with a grudge"

A lot of former employees have a damn good reason for a grudge.
I've never understood how that accusation amounts to anything.
He was trusted enough to be brought into a very exclusive inner circle, and he claims that trust was violated, and the country was betrayed. I've yet to see anyone accuse him of lying; only of being disgruntled.
If he's lying, lets see the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. This would be like all of us saying
"Lewinsky should have kept her big mouth shut." The reasons for speaking real are less important than the reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelaque liberal Donating Member (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. I 'm hoping that his candor will give other people of conscience
the courage to come forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelaque liberal Donating Member (981 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Like her-must read
www.truthout.org/docs_01/011204.shtml

Former Pentagon Insider:
'Neoconservative Propaganda Campaign Led to Iraq War'
By Karen Kwiatkowski
The American Conservative

January 19th Issue

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, a former Pentagon insider, concludes her observations on the run-up to the Iraq war in this last of a three-part series.
As the winter of 2002 approached, I was increasingly amazed at the success of the propaganda campaign being waged by President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and neoconservative mouthpieces at the Washington Times and Wall Street Journal. I speculated about the necessity but unlikelihood of a Phil-Dick-style minority report on the grandiose Feith-Wolfowitz-Rumsfeld-Cheney vision of some future Middle East where peace, love, and democracy are brought about by pre-emptive war and military occupation.

In December, I requested an acceleration of my retirement after just over 20 years on duty and exactly the required three years of time-in-grade as a lieutenant colonel. I felt fortunate not to have being fired or court-martialed due to my politically incorrect ways in the previous two years as a real conservative in a neoconservative Office of Secretary of Defense. But in fact, my outspokenness was probably never noticed because civilian professionals and military officers were largely invisible. We were easily replaceable and dispensable, not part of the team brought in from the American Enterprise Institute, the Center for Security Policy, and the Washington Institute for Near East Affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes...Karen Kwiatkowski and Richard Clark n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. Because he is a whistle blower
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 03:41 PM by yellowcanine
And whistle blowers often get fired precisely so they will be viewed as disgruntled former employees. Note that no one in the administration has addressed O'Neil's message in any specific way. Of course they will try to "shoot the messenger" and hope that detracts from the truth of what he is saying. Unfortunately for Bush, that tactic raises the sticky question of how O'Neil got one of the most important cabinet posts if was such an untrustworthy fellow. I think the Bushies are genuinely worried about O'Neil's charges. O'Neil's message is going to resonate with the traditional fiscally responsible conservatives. It may at least keep some of them home in November or keep them from working hard for Bush. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. I saw somewhere that a couple of anonymous cabinet members affirmed
what O'Neill said. Anybody see something on this? I was trying to find it in google and can't find anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. It was said in the 60 minutes piece
last night. Leslie Stahl didn't say who they were though, or the reporter who wrote the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Maybe Christie Whitman was one of them
She's certainly disgruntled, but doesn't have the guts to come out with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arendt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. The beauty of it is, you don't have to believe to demand an investigation
The Rethugs did that to Clinton.

Its the ACCUSATION that can be run with. Who
cares about the truth.

The Monica comparison is apt.

arendt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldcoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Check out this story from 2002
O'Neill's accusations are nothing new. The Sunday Herald printed a story about this plan in 2002. Here is the link:
http://www.sundayherald.com/27735 .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. Let's try REALITY and what really happened for starters.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. What's in it for him?
It's not HIS book that's getting sold, and he's not making one red ecnt off it, is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC