durutti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:01 PM
Original message |
Why should we believe O'Neill? |
|
Don't get me wrong -- personally, I *do* believe him, and I'm certain that at least some members of the Bush administration have been wanting to attack Iraq for a long time.
But just to play devil's advocate: what convincing arguments are there that O'Neill isn't just a former employee with a grudge?
|
kayell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. 19,000 documents should probably clear that question up. nt |
a_random_joel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 03:03 PM by a_random_joel
There are 19,000+ documents that back him up. (Smart guy)
Ron Suskind is a former WSJ reporter who has some credibility.
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. we had have multiple accounts of the way policy is set |
|
from people on the inside . That and the 19,000 pages of documents .
:hi:
|
braunbuddy
(2 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Does anyone know of a 1-hour news special regarding O'Neill's book to be aired this week??? I saw something on the TV yesterday but can't remember whether it was NBC, CBS et al.....
Please help!
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. It was 60 minutes yesterday CBS here's the transcript |
braunbuddy
(2 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
23. Actually I saw something in addition to this 60 Min. |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 04:41 PM by braunbuddy
Thanks. I watched the 60 Minutes program but this was a specific 1-hour segment and I think it was NBC or MSNBC but could be any of the networks (ABC, CNN, etc.)
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
25. I wonder if you are thinking of Kevin Phillips' book |
|
He had a hour show on c-span this week..with all these insider books coming out , I'm getting the names muddled a bit .
|
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
Wetzelbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:05 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The Axis of Evil was written into the GOP platform |
|
by a PNAC member named Bruce Jackson, right about the time John McCain was wiping the floor with The Chimp in the 2000 Republican primaries. It's been an issue out in the open well before The Chimp even knew Iraq was a country.
|
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. His Charges Don't Come in a Vacuum |
|
They're corroborated by many, many others...
|
salinen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. O'neil is a very rich man |
|
why expose yourself to the scrutiny and possible danger? I'd guess that he wants to clear his conscience. An honest man possibly?
|
PatrickS
(269 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. As opposed to Bush, Cheney & all? |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 03:09 PM by PatrickS
Come on!
|
Ready4Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
8. He served two previous Republican administrations. |
|
He served two previous Republican administrations. And served them well enough that the Bush II administration picked him again.
|
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
9. He got fired because he was telling the truth |
|
bush does not want honest people around him; he wants people who can keep a secret. People in the WH do not know what the truth is today because of all the lies told; therefore the need for secrecy. They forgot that axiom of Mark Twain, "always tell the truth and you'll never have to remember anything." O'Neill isn't holding a grudge. Condi may one day hold a grudge for sticking by the side of the monster, which effectively, has ruined her life after bush.
|
monobrau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"former employee with a grudge"
A lot of former employees have a damn good reason for a grudge. I've never understood how that accusation amounts to anything. He was trusted enough to be brought into a very exclusive inner circle, and he claims that trust was violated, and the country was betrayed. I've yet to see anyone accuse him of lying; only of being disgruntled. If he's lying, lets see the evidence.
|
salinen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. This would be like all of us saying |
|
"Lewinsky should have kept her big mouth shut." The reasons for speaking real are less important than the reality.
|
chelaque liberal
(981 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I 'm hoping that his candor will give other people of conscience |
|
the courage to come forward.
|
chelaque liberal
(981 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
www.truthout.org/docs_01/011204.shtml
Former Pentagon Insider: 'Neoconservative Propaganda Campaign Led to Iraq War' By Karen Kwiatkowski The American Conservative
January 19th Issue
Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, a former Pentagon insider, concludes her observations on the run-up to the Iraq war in this last of a three-part series. As the winter of 2002 approached, I was increasingly amazed at the success of the propaganda campaign being waged by President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and neoconservative mouthpieces at the Washington Times and Wall Street Journal. I speculated about the necessity but unlikelihood of a Phil-Dick-style minority report on the grandiose Feith-Wolfowitz-Rumsfeld-Cheney vision of some future Middle East where peace, love, and democracy are brought about by pre-emptive war and military occupation.
In December, I requested an acceleration of my retirement after just over 20 years on duty and exactly the required three years of time-in-grade as a lieutenant colonel. I felt fortunate not to have being fired or court-martialed due to my politically incorrect ways in the previous two years as a real conservative in a neoconservative Office of Secretary of Defense. But in fact, my outspokenness was probably never noticed because civilian professionals and military officers were largely invisible. We were easily replaceable and dispensable, not part of the team brought in from the American Enterprise Institute, the Center for Security Policy, and the Washington Institute for Near East Affairs.
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Yes...Karen Kwiatkowski and Richard Clark n/t |
yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Because he is a whistle blower |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 03:41 PM by yellowcanine
And whistle blowers often get fired precisely so they will be viewed as disgruntled former employees. Note that no one in the administration has addressed O'Neil's message in any specific way. Of course they will try to "shoot the messenger" and hope that detracts from the truth of what he is saying. Unfortunately for Bush, that tactic raises the sticky question of how O'Neil got one of the most important cabinet posts if was such an untrustworthy fellow. I think the Bushies are genuinely worried about O'Neil's charges. O'Neil's message is going to resonate with the traditional fiscally responsible conservatives. It may at least keep some of them home in November or keep them from working hard for Bush. Good.
|
kerry-is-my-prez
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I saw somewhere that a couple of anonymous cabinet members affirmed |
|
what O'Neill said. Anybody see something on this? I was trying to find it in google and can't find anything?
|
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. It was said in the 60 minutes piece |
|
last night. Leslie Stahl didn't say who they were though, or the reporter who wrote the book.
|
kskiska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
27. Maybe Christie Whitman was one of them |
|
She's certainly disgruntled, but doesn't have the guts to come out with it.
|
arendt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
19. The beauty of it is, you don't have to believe to demand an investigation |
|
The Rethugs did that to Clinton.
Its the ACCUSATION that can be run with. Who cares about the truth.
The Monica comparison is apt.
arendt
|
oldcoot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Check out this story from 2002 |
|
O'Neill's accusations are nothing new. The Sunday Herald printed a story about this plan in 2002. Here is the link: http://www.sundayherald.com/27735 .
|
loudnclear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Let's try REALITY and what really happened for starters. |
Nevernose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message |
24. What's in it for him? |
|
It's not HIS book that's getting sold, and he's not making one red ecnt off it, is he?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |