slater71
(586 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 06:54 PM
Original message |
Fox`s Brit "Dogface" Hume tearing apart O`Neill |
|
He has three rightwing neocons on lead by Fred barnes just saying all kinds of things from how O`Neill is a disgruntaled employee, he never did have any policies to put forth, the other asshole says that we have plans to envade every country that is against us and always have. What they fail to say is there are no plans for a preemptive strike. This Bush saying "find me a way" they will smear O`Neill`s story with distortion day after day until the people believe them just like Iraq is responsable for the towers coming down. These lying Nazi bastards.
|
hellhathnofury
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Welcome to 1933 Germany! |
|
Is this a Bush propaganda meeting?
One word to the first accusation. AIDs.
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. major memo's to faux --- stonewall -- lie--- "we are taking water" |
|
these anchors are toast...when their lie are exposed...they will be laughed at for quite a long time
|
buycitgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message |
3. more power to you for listening to that. I have a weak stomach |
|
I wonder if they used this quote from James Steinberg, former deputy NSC advisor to Clinton:
"We did NOT have a plan to use American ground troops to overthrow, uh, the regime of Saddam Hussein."
bet that didn't fit with their little scenario did it?
|
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:01 PM
Original message |
all good news--let the bastards stew in their own shit for a while |
|
great publicity for the book! :D
|
rumguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
8. they are stewing in their own shit! and on the defensive... |
|
the pigs are squealing...
|
Selwynn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. 19,000 pages of documents. 19.000 pages of documents. 19,000 pages of do |
|
I don't care what they say about the man. I've yet to hear any Administration person or media lackey come up with an explanation for the cold hard facts on paper. Doesn't really matter who the messenger is, now does it?
|
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Good afternoon Selwynn |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 07:07 PM by wtmusic
I guess GephardtClark got tombstoned, I went to bed too.
So '19,000 pages' has kinda become your calling card *paste* *paste* *paste*...:D
|
Selwynn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. Yes indeed! But I don't mean it to be dismissive -- |
|
...it just seems to me that this is the real issue. 19,000 pages of documents. No one seems to be saying these documents are forged or false? So I mean, it really doesn't matter what the man is like - the only reason I even give this story the time of day is because of the documents.
To me, they are what matters.
But yes, I shorthand all of that into: 19,000 pages of documents. 19,000 pages of documents. 19,000 pages of do-
It's like my way of saying "It's the documents, stupid." Hehe :D
|
Media_Lies_Daily
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Who cares what they say? O'Neil has the documentation... |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
rumguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. the people's firing squad? |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
rumguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. I would never endorse "People's firing squads" |
|
I thought we stood for freedom of speech, huh? Even speech we don't like...
Say what you will about Brit Hume...he's a lier and a phoney...but he has the RIGHT to be a lier and a phoney...
|
FarLeftRage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
is all well and good, but in the media's case they have blatantly abused it.
They must be held accountable for the active participation in the crimes of the illegal regime.
People can only take so much before they react to a bad situation.
I don't watch, heart or read anything the media puts out if I can help it.
As far as endorsing "People's firing squads", I am not.
But if we reach a point where a revolution and it's aftermath needs to bring justice to where it is needed, then so be it.
|
DBoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
24. We don't advocate killing people here at DU |
|
I'd rather force him to spend the rest of his life doing menial housekeeping for a radical lesbian feminist couple.
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. Gee, that's what I thought, too. |
Gysgt213
(56 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Of course they are doing with no defend O'Neil |
SpaceCatMeetsMars
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message |
11. That is an insult to dogs. n/t |
TreasonousBastard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Heard something an hour or so ago... |
|
about how they're looking into whether he did something illegal in letting out those 19,000 pages.
They won't stop until the story is dead.
|
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Hume is such a foxhole! |
|
had to try that new one out...
|
the populist
(283 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
16. He can do it all he wants. |
|
This story, especially when Dean picks up on it, is going to tear FAUX a new one.
|
peacetalksforall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Just read this ...not Hume and jokesters... but related. |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 07:27 PM by higher class
"Republican Rep. Mark Foley of Florida accused O'Neill of taking ''a Shakespearean approach to advance his career and his book sales. Not since Julius Caesar have I seen such a blatant stab in the back. Et tu, Mr. O'Neill?''
Career? Isn't that a riot? He's retired, man... Book sales? He's said he's not taking money. Shakesperean? Yeah for Will! Works for O'Neill.
Why don't they say that he is doing it for his ego.
(Mark Foley = one the the supreme moralists assassinating Clinton, lest you forget.)
|
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
19. If Assholes Could Fly, Fox News Would Be an Airport! |
readmylips
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Hope O'Neill turns pertinent papers to the 9-11 |
|
investigators, and I hope the lawyers suing on behalf of 9-11 survivors, to go court to force O'Neill to share information with them. They better do it soon or the State Department will issue a surpena(?) and take O'Neill's papers. Even, A$$crap can file an order holding O'Neill as a terrorists, under the terrorist/home security act. Terrorist/home security act, seems to me, was inacted to cover the boosh ganter's own asses. They knew all the dirty work they were doing in secrecy. This boosh gansters stop at nothing.
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Mr. Hume does have a "Dog face" |
|
Haven't see him for a couple of years now. So he probably looks like a worn out old dog now.
Now Ann Coulter looks like a Afghan hound dog to me. You know those big big dogs with with long skinny legs and extra long hair that hangs over the face and their long long snoot.
|
slater71
(586 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
Yea she does look like that kind of dog.
|
kskiska
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
isn't considered just another "disgruntled employee" so disregard anything he says?
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
loudnclear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Remember they "tore apart" Wilson as a liar and exaggerator until |
|
the truth came out and then they didn't want to talk about him at all.
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
29. "Find a Way" - Our Dems Need to DRUM This Slogan |
|
Everybody KNOWS it's TRUE---------------"FIND A WAY"
|
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
30. "Find a Way" - Our Dems Need to DRUM This Slogan |
|
Everybody KNOWS it's TRUE---------------"FIND A WAY"
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |