Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anderson Cooper on CNN discussing O'Neill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 07:59 PM
Original message
Anderson Cooper on CNN discussing O'Neill
93% in Buzzpoll were positive about O'Neill, 7% negative

Now AC's discussing whether ON is a whistle-blower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Zahn up. Leads with summit. O'Neill 2nd.
Spin is...no spin yet. King (WH Corres)-brings up class. docs...only allegations yet...WH says nothing to do with investigation...backstabber spin...O'Neill could go to ethics committee...using Bob Woodrward to counter claims...David Frum on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. John King: the admin. is investigating whether O'Neill
revealed classified info.

Why will they not address whether what O'Neill is saying is TRUE?

Inquiring minds want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. King said that the Treas did this on their own.
Maybe they want to take away the threat quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Requires knowledge on part of reporter
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 08:16 PM by DrBB
The ideology of the media is neither left nor right, it's LAZINESS. To actually know anything, and report accordingly, requires WORK. Not just long hours, but intellectual discernment and analysis. To actually report on the substance of something like this requires a command of fact and detail that few of these blowdried bozos has any conception of. They specialize in hair styling and makeup. Hence their eagerness to report on sweaters and earth tones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Maybe someone is trying to save their own ass?
He's the only one to report that to my knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. if laziness were the only problem, there would be nothing systematic
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 08:23 PM by spooky3
in the slant. However, recent books and FAIR have documented that there is. Laziness and deadlines are part of the problem but the political views of the owners of big media, and their unwillingness to set them aside in order to do the ethical duty of the media, are another part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Love this post from Josh Marshall
Number of days between Novak column outing Valerie Plame and announcement of investigation: 74 days.

Number of days between O'Neill 60 Minutes interview and announcement of investigation: 1 day.

Having the administration reveal itself as a gaggle of hypocritcal goons ... priceless.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh my...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC