Cush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:02 PM
Original message |
Olbemann talking about O'Neill (MSNBC) |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 08:03 PM by Cush
Keith is pretty reliable, lets see what he does with it
|
Cush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 08:07 PM by Cush
"this is seen as the ultimate betrayal by the WH"
Hmm, so they're not denying it?
Pat Buchanan is on.
Keith: isn't there a cath 22? if he's such an idiot, why was he hired ion the first place?
Pat: What Paul did isn't honrable, blah blah.
Gee Pat, I guess you got the message since you lost your show
|
spooky3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. KO: "the first snappy retort from this admin." |
|
was that he was a bad employee. If he was so bad, why did they keep him for 2 years?
Pat BSing the response.
|
PaDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
and all those resignations..oh, forgot, they were homesick and wanted family time...My ass!
|
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. Yes, Paul should have done the honorable thing and perpetuated |
|
the lies told by this misadministration. What planet are these people from?
|
hellhathnofury
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Damn Pat Buchanan, he knows nothing. Defends Bush weakly. |
PaDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
trying to cover..spin, spin, spin
|
Marymarg
(773 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. When Pat reads the book... |
|
I'll be interested to hear what he has to say. Right now, it is obvious he has not and thus really doesn't know what he's talking about.
|
alcuno
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It's all about Bush being "betrayed." |
|
Hey! What about the American people?
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. why'd they get Pat instead of a PNACer? |
|
the Cabal is conspicuously missing from these reaction shots (except for Evans and Snow) Why can't we see Rove EVER!!!???!
|
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Olberman said Democrats were too busy trying to destroy each other... |
|
rather than trying to get their hands on the 19,000 documents so they could destroy George Bush...(not verbatim but the general gist of his comments)
|
lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
BigBigBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message |
11. This must be painful for Buchanan |
|
First the immigration thing, now he must keep a straight face trying to defend the Vile Little Man against O'Neill.
Buchanan despises Bush - thinks he a nincompoop sock-puppet for the neocons. Buchanan is old school conservative (better, if not much), and he knows he's forgotten more about domestic and foreign policy than Shrub knows right now.
But he's a loyal Republican.
|
Cush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. I think he got the message |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 08:42 PM by Cush
from MSNBC. Basically: "We canned your show, if you don't shape up, you're off the network"
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Is that what putting your party above your country is called? It's sickening.
|
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. Well, then I guess he deserves all the pain he gets. |
|
It's this "loyalty" to thieves and murderers that has gotten us where we are now.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:06 PM
Response to Original message |