Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone watch Jim Lehrer News Hour tonight?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:09 PM
Original message
Did anyone watch Jim Lehrer News Hour tonight?
There was a PBS news message after the news hour. That junior had nothing to say about Paul O'Neill, and he only followed the Clinton administration on invading Iraq. End of message. "WTF" did I hear right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gysgt213 Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have always said, (I know I new to this forum) Bush will find a way to
blame Clinton for anything that goes wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Followed the Clinton administration on Iraq?
I don't remember Bill Clinton invading Iraq, do you? BTW, since when does the Bush administration follow the Clinton line on anything? WTF is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm sure Tom Tomorrow is preparing a treat as we type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Well why didn't they follow the Clinton Administration on Al-Quaeda
Why then didn't they follow the Clinton Administration on anti-terrorism, "rolling up Al-Quaeda", and all that stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. So you're saying that they made an announcement AFTER the news?
Was it during the newshour or after? Who announced it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. I saw Madeline Albright on Charlie Rose last week and here is what she
said. She said they called for a regime change in 1998 but it didn't have anything to do with pre-emptive war. IF and she meant IF they were going to persue the idea they would want the Iraqi people to rise against Saddam with the assistance of the international community. She stated that what * has done is made the region so unstable that it does in fact threaten the security of the United States. She said the jury is still out regarding the future of Iraq.

I expect to see more of her on television defending and explaining clearly the Clinton policy on Iraq regime change. It didn't sound anything like what * did to Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfish Donating Member (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I wish we would hear from Clinton
on this. He really needs to speak up, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush...said...he...was...only...following......
THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON INVADING IRAQ!!!!!!! LOL!!!!

Now I've heard everything. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did he claim to follow Clinton on "invading" Iraq. . .
or in believing that Saddam had unconventional weapons?

I've heard many -- both within BushCo and among the presstitutes -- claim Clinton-era support for their current actions, or rather, claim that the Clinton Administration also believed Saddam had proscribed weapons. Of course, this may be true, and my understanding is Clinton himself has recently given credence to this belief. What differentiates Clinton from Bush, however, is that though Clinton may have believed Saddam had such weapons, he didn't act against International Law to pursue their removal, nor did he alienate the U.S. from the comity of nations in a misguided, fruitless & pointless act of aggression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Clinton blame game will not hunt.
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 09:24 PM by loudnclear
Clinton's plans were what PNACers sent him. It was not his plan.
Yes, Saddam was seen as a bad person and a regime change was favored but no where were there plans for an invasion except in the PNAC files.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC