CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 10:17 PM
Original message |
| Why is it that * didn't listen to Clinton's advisors about the Bin Laden |
|
threat, but were all super duper gung ho to follow his Saddam "regime change" policy?
|
| acmavm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Because they had other plans. They had their eyes on Iraq. And any |
|
intelligence that Clinton tried to pass along just didn't fit in with those plans. Going after OBL wouldn't have gotten them into the oil fields.
|
| IADEMO2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
could it be maybe, oh, I don't know OIL
|
| FloridaPat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-12-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Too busy wining & dining the Taliban for those oil pipeline |
|
right. And bin Ladin was financing the Taliban. They were pals until the Taliban said no to Bush & Bush then threatened the Taliban. And if you think about it, if a real threat gives you the right for a pre-emptive strike, what did Bush's threat to the Taliban give them (and bin Laden ) the right to do?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
