phillybri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-13-04 11:07 AM
Original message |
Why Bush can't pin Iraq War on Clinton... |
|
Throughout the 2000 campaign, Bush CONSTANTLY railed against Clinton's "nation-building" exercises as detrimental to our military and our national security.
Now we're supposed to believe he picked up right where Clinton left off?
BULLSHIT!!!
|
radwriter0555
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-13-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Check the 1998 Rumsfeld Security Commission Report for any and ALL |
|
Clinton Administration Policies on Iraq. http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1998_cr/s980731-rumsfeld.htmJust a start. The name "Rumsfeld" sound FAMILIAR?
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-13-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
2. exactly...that was on 60 minutes |
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-13-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |
3. even the American people |
|
will wonder how Clinton started the war when he was not the president. unless private citizens can order our armies to invade another country,i think it`s safe to assume that bush is responsible. the "other guy did it-i just went along for the ride" defense really doesn`t work when you are the president of the united states. we have a child running our nation,it seems he is incapable of taking any responsibility for his actions-"he made me do it"
|
radwriter0555
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-13-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Curiously, I've stumbled on some rather astounding links with rummy |
|
and israel joined in their opposition of Iraq? I'm not sure what I'm looking at here. A little help please? http://www.cdiss.org/00feb28.htmhttp://www.cdiss.org/mdnews.htmhttp://www.cdiss.org/credits.htmAnd then, at the bottom of this page, http://www.cdiss.org/98july2.htmis a link that takes me HERE.. http://armedservices.house.gov/So what in heck are we seeing here? Is this a government site???
|
Cannikin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-13-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
UTUSN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-13-04 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Plus, the Shrubbite Policy Was A.B.C. - Anything But CLINTON |
|
The CLINTON policy was a wish, like, Gee it would be good if Saddam were gone. But from Day One, the Shrubbites pursued A.B.C., ignorning the transition briefings, ignoring the HART-RUDMAN report, ignoring GORE's white paper on airport security. They shelved everything-CLINTON pending CHEENEE's supposed review of everything. It's irrelevant for the Shrubbites now claiming they were pursuing a CLINTON policy.
As for issues from the campaign - "issues" DON'T MATTER to the Shubbites, only winning power and getting their private agenda through matter.
|
lovedems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-13-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
7. CBS did a great job sunday night showing * railing against |
|
nation building and stretching the miliatary to thin right before they started to interview O'Neill. That's all the dems have to do this year and that is use * OWN WORDS AGAINST HIM. It is that simple. You can show he is a liar by showing clips of him speaking for himself.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message |