Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McAuliffe: It took 70 days to investigate CIA leak vs. 2 hours for O'Neill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:38 PM
Original message
McAuliffe: It took 70 days to investigate CIA leak vs. 2 hours for O'Neill
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 01:49 PM by gore-is-my-president
investigation. Why is that?"

My comment: And we still haven't investigated 911 - which happened 2 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. funny how that works isnt it...
of all the words for this adminsitration, Brazen has to be near the top of the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought the same thing.
Funny huh. They are crooks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. In fairness, O'Neil has not been investigated.
It was only yesterday that Treasury decided to investigate.

I haven't seen anything to make me think they have even started yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Maybe that they started the investigation rolling or made an announcement
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No! It took 70 days before they even moved to start an investigation
70 days to get to the point they are now at with O'Neill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think if you check the record it took 70 days for an special prosector
to be announced. That doesn't mean there was no investigation before then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. but the basic point is true,
you get what McAuliffe is saying, don't you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Maybe I missed something... Is there a special prosecutor
in this case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. it's about the level of interest
When it's damaging to Bush, there's zero interest, when it has retaliation value against Bush critics they're all over it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Wrong
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 02:24 PM by Beetwasher
It took 70+ days before they announced that there would be ANY investigation...The special prosecutor was only just announced recently.

July: Novak prints article outing Plame
Sept: An investigation is announced
Dec: Ashcroft recuses and Fitz is appointed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. they gave him the documents ...he took NOTHING not approved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why is that? Betrayal of the nation versus "betrayal" of bush
That thin-skinned arrogant waste of oxygen thinks no one, but no one, should ever reveal his hubris-infested policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. McAuliffe should credit where he got his quote from
Edited on Tue Jan-13-04 02:22 PM by trumad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shananigans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. that doesn't necessarily mean that he got it
from this guy...I am sure there are a dozen possible people who have said similar things... Accusing him of verbal plagarism is a pretty serious charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I wish
McAuliffe was this clever more often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thingfish Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Josh Marshall's take on this is great.
Number of days between Novak column outing Valerie Plame and announcement of investigation: 74 days.
Number of days between O'Neill 60 Minutes interview and announcement of investigation: 1 day.
Having the administration reveal itself as a gaggle of hypocritcal goons... Priceless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hi thingfish!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shananigans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. No one ever welcomed me!
It's just not fair :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. 2 Years, 2 Months, 2 Hours - How's that for a meme?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC