Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More BBV and other voting issues...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jeebo Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 01:45 AM
Original message
More BBV and other voting issues...
Hey y'all, read this article:

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/auto/epaper/editions/tuesday/south_county_043067d0f561b16d008d.html

This article REALLY makes my blood boil. Here are some excerpts and my reactions to them:

<< It was the first time a Florida election using touch screens has been decided by less than 0.25 percent. When an election is that close, Florida law requires a "manual recount" of all under-votes and over-votes. >>

Well then WHY THE F**K didn't we have a manual recount of all the under- and overvotes IN THE 2000 ELECTION? We Democrats should have DEMANDED one. AND THE LAW WAS ON OUR SIDE. THE LAW IN FACT REQUIRED what we would have been DEMANDING.

<< While its guidelines are "not presently definitive," Kast said the division will probably end up with a rule stating that votes cast on electronic voting machines will not be subject to a manual recount. >>

Huh? You mean they're going to just IGNORE THE LAW? WE'VE GOT TO REFUSE TO ALLOW THEM TO DO THIS. We've got to INSIST and DEMAND that they OBEY THE LAW. But then we all know that Republicans can get away with just IGNORING the law.

<< A manual recount, he said, is to determine whether ballots that could not be read by tabulating machines contain any marks that might provide "clear indication on the ballot that a voter has made a definite choice." >>

But that "clear indication" DID exist on the PAPER ballots that were cast in the 2000 election. SO HOW IS IT THAT THOSE G*****N REPUBLICANS WERE ABLE TO KEEP THOSE BALLOTS AWAY FROM HUMAN EYES? Especially when it was IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW?

<< "The reason we got in trouble in 2000 was because we had no statewide standard for determining voter intent," Dion said. >>

BUT WE DID HAVE THAT STANDARD in the 2000 election. Florida law clearly and unambiguously stated that a valid vote was one on a ballot that under a visual examination showed the "clear will and intent of the voter." SO WHY DIDN'T WE APPLY THAT STANDARD?

Jesus H. Christ, what's happening to this country? And what are we going to do if the Republicans steal the White House AGAIN on Nov. 2?

Ron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC